Re: [PATCH 13/X] [libsanitizer][options] Add hwasan flags and argument parsing

gt; >> which wants to treat the two sanitizers as alternate implementations > of > > >> the same thing gets that automatically. > > >> > > >> My preference is to use __SANITIZE_HWADDRESS__ since that means any > > >> existing code will not be predicate

Re: Question on direction of GCC support for HWASAN.

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 9:36 AM Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > On 23/09/2019 08:52, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 9/20/19 7:11 PM, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > >> The implementation is unlikely to be production-quality since > >> development on libhwasan is only on its `platform` ABI. This libhwasan > >>

Re: [Patch 0/X] [WIP][RFC][libsanitizer] Introduce HWASAN to GCC

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:37 AM Matthew Malcomson wrote: > > On 11/09/19 12:53, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 9/9/19 5:54 PM, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > >> On 09/09/19 11:47, Martin Liška wrote: > >>> On 9/6/19 4:46 PM, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > Hello, > > >> As I understand it,

Re: [PATCH 1/7] Libsanitizer merge from upstream r249633.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > > > On 14-10-2015 04:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 07:54:33PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: >>> On 13/10/15 14:15, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: This is the raw merge itself. I'm