On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:58:26PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:44:39PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 21/10/16 14:36 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:53:49PM -0400, Ryan Burn wrote:
> > > > Are excepti
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:44:39PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21/10/16 14:36 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:53:49PM -0400, Ryan Burn wrote:
> > > Are exception classes required to support emplace new construction
> > > like that? Wi
B exception objects only by means of applying
> move()
> operation on an exception thrown out of TBB scheduler. **/
> void* operator new ( size_t );
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wr
Jonathan,
Is this version OK with you?
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:49:24AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Instead of throwing an exception allocate its memory and initialize it
> explicitly. Makes std::make_exception_ptr more efficient since no stack
> unwinding is needed.
>
> v
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:22:18AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/29/2016 11:19 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > > I'll table your patch on that assumption.
> > OK. Can you ping him about it after he will back or should I (although in
> > another week I will be on PTO
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:56:02AM +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote:
> 2016-08-05 6:49 GMT+02:00 Gleb Natapov <g...@scylladb.com>:
> > Instead of throwing an exception allocate its memory and initialize it
> > explicitly. Makes std::make_exception_ptr more efficient since n
Instead of throwing an exception allocate its memory and initialize it
explicitly. Makes std::make_exception_ptr more efficient since no stack
unwinding is needed.
v1->v2:
- fix indentation
- drop static from __dest_thunk
- use static_cast instead of reinterpret_cast
* libsupc++/exception
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:01:45PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 04/08/16 20:01 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > Instead of throwing an exception allocate its memory and initialize it
> > explicitly. Makes std::make_exception_ptr more efficient since no stack
> >
Instead of throwing an exception allocate its memory and initialize it
explicitly. Makes std::make_exception_ptr more efficient since no stack
unwinding is needed.
In this version I hopefully addressed all Jonathan comments.
* libsupc++/exception (std::exception): Move...
*
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:47:30PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > > + } // namespace __exception_ptr
> > > >
> > > > /// Obtain an exception_ptr pointing to a copy of the supplied object.
> > > > template
> > > > @@ -173,7 +184,15 @@ namespace std
> > > > #if __cpp_exceptions
> >
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:48:27AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/07/16 10:20 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > [resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
> >
> > Here is my attempt to fix
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/07/16 10:20 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > [resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
> >
> > Here is my attempt to fix
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:54:21AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/29/2016 10:03 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > It's been a couple years since I've really thought about these kinds of
> > > > synchronization issues -- is it really safe in a weakly ordered
> > > > processor to
> > > > rely on the mutex
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:03:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/27/2016 10:24 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:12:18PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > On 07/25/2016 07:44 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > _Unwind_Find_FDE calls _Unwind_Find_re
[resent with hopefully correct libstdc++ mailing list address this time]
Here is my attempt to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
is a little bit long because I had to split and cxxabi.h
include files. The former had to be split due to circular dependency
Here is my attempt to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297. The resulting patch
is a little bit long because I had to split and cxxabi.h
include files. The former had to be split due to circular dependency
that formed after including in exception_ptr.h and the later
is because
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:12:18PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 07:44 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > _Unwind_Find_FDE calls _Unwind_Find_registered_FDE and it takes lock even
> > when there is no registered objects. As far as I see only statically
> > lin
_Unwind_Find_FDE calls _Unwind_Find_registered_FDE and it takes lock even
when there is no registered objects. As far as I see only statically
linked applications call __register_frame_info* functions, so for
dynamically linked executables taking the lock to check unseen_objects
and seen_objects
Thank you for prompt review.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:00:53AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Gleb Natapov <g...@scylladb.com> wrote:
> > _Unwind_Find_FDE calls _Unwind_Find_registered_FDE and it takes lock even
> > when there is no registered
_Unwind_Find_FDE calls _Unwind_Find_registered_FDE and it takes lock even
when there is no registered objects. As far as I see only statically
linked applications call __register_frame_info* functions, so for
dynamically linked executables taking the lock to check unseen_objects
and seen_objects
20 matches
Mail list logo
