Hello Gerald,
Thank you for reviewing the earlier patch.
PFA, the patch modified as per your suggestion.
I have also attached here another patch for contrib.texi file changes.
Please let me know if any modifications are required in it.
Thanks and Regards,
Jayant Sonar
[KPIT Cummins, Pune]
Hello Gerald,
Thank you for this suggestion.
I have not worked on these changes before. Therefore, can you please review
the attached patch and let me know if any changes are required to be done in
it.
Thanks and Regards,
Jayant Sonar
[KPIT Cummins, Pune]
cr16-htdocs2.diff
Description:
Committed.
* MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself.
Index: MAINTAINERS
===
--- MAINTAINERS (revision 183832)
+++ MAINTAINERS (working copy)
@@ -495,6 +495,7 @@
Franz Sirl
Hello Hans-Peter,
I guess, we do have a corporate assignment for KPIT.
It was signed by Bradley Kuhn from FSF side and Dhananjay Deshpande from
KPIT side, during April 2003. In a mail, Peter Brown from FSF has mentioned
ticket number #22417 which was associated with this corporate assignment.
Hello Richard and Joseph,
Thanks a lot for reviewing the patch.
I will work on the problems pointed out by Richard. As he has mentioned,
I can check in those changes post-commit. If so, I would prefer that option.
In that case, do we need to wait for someone else's approval or can this
be
PING 8: For reviewing the modified CR16 port.
Hello,
Can some one please review the updated patch and let me know if any more
changes are required to be done in it?
Rainer had suggested few important changes last time. After making those
changes, the modified patch was posted at following
PING 7: For reviewing the modified CR16 port.
Hello,
Can some one please review the updated patch and let me know if any more
changes are required to be done in it?
Rainer had suggested few important changes last time. After making those
changes, the modified patch was posted at following
PING: For reviewing the modified CR16 port.
Hello,
Can some one please review the updated patch and let me know if any more
changes are required to be done in it?
The modified patch was posted at following URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02625.html
Thanks and Regards,
Ping 5: For review
Can someone please review the modified patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01985.html
Most of the suggestions made by Richard have been accommodated in the
modified patch. Richard's suggestions can be referred at:
