> I just finished running the testsuite on x86_64-pc-cygwin for
> Jonathan's latest patch and compared the results against an older
> (about two months old) run, and so far I'm not seeing any regressions.
> Granted, this is strictly preliminary; I'm currently re-running the
> testsuite on the up-to
> Hi, this commit makes the GCC build to fail for targets using newlib
> (I tested arm-none-eabi and aarch64-none-elf)
>
> I'm seeing errors such as:
> In file included from
> /tmp/9122162_8.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/builds/gcc-fsf-gccsrc/obj-aarch64_be-none-elf/gcc3/aarch64_be-none-elf/libstdc++-v3/inclu
> On 12/11/15 13:39 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> One downside of this change is that we introduce some (hopefully safe)
>> ODR violations, where inline functions and templates that depend on
>> _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FOO might now be defined differently in C++98 and
>> C++11 code. Previously they
lthough the
poster apparently never got around to testing it.
> THanks for doing this work, it will help several other platforms, not
> only Cygwin.
No problem. ^.^
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 18/09/15 11:17 -0400, Jennifer Yao wrote:
>>
&
tps://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66530> (to circumvent,
install the build tree or add the directory containing the built DLL
and import library to PATH).
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2015-09-18 Jennifer Yao
PR libstdc++/58393
PR libstdc++/61580
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENAB
