[PATCHES, Committed] As obvious

Committed as obvious: commit 061b13ed014ba0b6891800a5c7f852bf58e4d856 Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: Thu Feb 16 18:13:56 2023 -0800 Fortran Tests: Allow passing on mingw. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90: Add *-*-ming* to dg-final. and

[patch, fortran] PR103506 [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c

Attached patch fixes this problem by allowing the namespace pointer to be set correctly regardless of error condition. Regression tested on x86_64_linux_gnu. OK for trunk and backports? Regards, Jerry Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: Sat Jan 28 20:00:34 2023 -0800 ICE in

[patch, gfortran.dg] Allow test to pass on mingw

Hi all, Similar to a patch I committed a while ago for Cygwin, the attached patch allows it to pass on the mingw version of gfortran. It is trivial. Ok for trunk? Regards, Jerrydiff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90

[patch, fortran] ICE in attr_decl1, at fortran/decl.c:8691

The attached patch was provided by Steve Kargl. After exploring for possible other checks I settled on leaving the patch intact. Two existing test cases updated as different but sensible error messages resulted. Regression tested on main line. OK to commit? Regards, Jerry Author: Steve

Re: [PATCH, Fortran] PR fortran/93524 - ISO_Fortran_binding signed char arrays

Looks good and I have tested. I will commit after one more double check for regressions with the test case in the testsuite I have been following Harris on this one for several days and tested the patch before submitted here. Thanks for patch Harris, much appreciated. Regards, Jerry On

Re: Ping: [Patch, fortran] PR97694 - ICE with optional assumed rank class(*) argument (and PR97723)

LGTM Paul, go for it. On 12/26/20 8:37 AM, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran wrote: Ping! On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 10:38, Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: Fortran: Fix some select rank issues [PR97694 and 97723]. Hi All, Unlike select type, select rank selectors

Re: *PING* [PATCH] PR fortran/90903 [part2] Add runtime checking for the MVBITS intrinsic

Harold, Looks good. Thanks for the work! Jerry On 9/20/20 11:10 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote: *ping* Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. September 2020 um 23:24 Uhr Von: "Harald Anlauf" An: "fortran" , "gcc-patches" Cc: "Paul Richard Thomas" Betreff: [PATCH] PR fortran/90903 [part2] Add runtime checking

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/97036 - [F2018] Allow ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE procedure prefix

ok, thanks . On 9/15/20 1:35 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: As stated in the PR, the Fortran 2018 standard removed the restriction prohibiting ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE procedures. Adjust the relevant check. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master? Thanks, Harald PR fortran/97036 - [F2018]

Re: [PATCH] Fortran : rejected f0.d edit descriptor PR96436

On 8/17/20 12:31 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote: Please find attached a patch for PR96436. OK to commit? Looks good to me.  Thanks for fixing this. Regards, Jerry

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR93671 - gfortran 8-10 ICE on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived-type component of coarray

This look good, OK to commit. Thanks, Jerry On 8/10/20 8:03 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi folks, long time, no see. I was asked by Damian to do some Coarray stuff in gfortran so here is the first step on fixing a bug. The issue at hand is, that the coarray handling is not propagated

Re: [PATCH] Fortran : ICE in gfc_check_reshape PR95585

OK to commit and Backport. On 6/18/20 1:11 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote: Please find attached fix for PR95585. OK to commit and backport? Commit message: Fortran  : ICE in gfc_check_reshape PR95585 Issue an error where an array is used before its definition instead of an ICE. 2020-06-18 

Re: [PATCH] Fortran : ICE in gfc_check_pointer_assign PR95612

OK to commit and backport. On 6/30/20 11:12 PM, Mark Eggleston wrote: Please find attached a patch which is a fix for PR95612.  The original patch is by Steve Kargl. OK to commit and backport? Commit message: Fortran  : ICE in gfc_check_pointer_assign PR95612 Output an error if the right

Re: [PATCH] Fortran : Fill in missing array dimensions using the lower, bound (for review)

On 6/27/20 1:40 AM, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote: Hi Mark, Use -fdec-add-missing-indexes to enable feature. Also enabled by fdec. A warning that the lower bound is being used for a mission dimension is output unless suppressed by using -Wno-missing-index. This is... seriously

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/95707 - ICE in finish_equivalences, at fortran/trans-common.c:1319

OK, and once again, thanks. Jerry On 6/17/20 12:27 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Another corner case of buffer overflows during name mangling found by Gerhard. We now check that the new buffer sizes suffice. The patch is on top of the patches for PRs 95687, 95688, 95689. Regtested on

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/95827 - Buffer overflows with PDTs and long symbols

OK, and thanks for Patch. On 6/23/20 2:08 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote: Dear all, here's another case with a buffer that did overflow. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master / backports? Thanks, Harald PR fortran/95827 - Buffer overflows with PDTs and long symbols With submodules and