Committed as obvious:
commit 061b13ed014ba0b6891800a5c7f852bf58e4d856
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: Thu Feb 16 18:13:56 2023 -0800
Fortran Tests: Allow passing on mingw.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90: Add *-*-ming* to
dg-final.
and
co
Attached patch fixes this problem by allowing the namespace pointer to
be set correctly regardless of error condition.
Regression tested on x86_64_linux_gnu.
OK for trunk and backports?
Regards,
Jerry
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: Sat Jan 28 20:00:34 2023 -0800
ICE in gfc_free_namespace
Hi all,
Similar to a patch I committed a while ago for Cygwin, the attached
patch allows it to pass on the mingw version of gfortran.
It is trivial.
Ok for trunk?
Regards,
Jerrydiff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f9
The attached patch was provided by Steve Kargl. After exploring for
possible other checks I settled on leaving the patch intact.
Two existing test cases updated as different but sensible error messages
resulted.
Regression tested on main line.
OK to commit?
Regards,
Jerry
Author: Steve Kargl
Looks good and I have tested. I will commit after one more double check
for regressions with the test case in the testsuite
I have been following Harris on this one for several days and tested the
patch before submitted here.
Thanks for patch Harris, much appreciated.
Regards,
Jerry
On 1/1
LGTM Paul, go for it.
On 12/26/20 8:37 AM, Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran wrote:
Ping!
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 10:38, Paul Richard Thomas <
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
Fortran: Fix some select rank issues [PR97694 and 97723].
Hi All,
Unlike select type, select rank selectors retai
Harold, Looks good. Thanks for the work!
Jerry
On 9/20/20 11:10 AM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
*ping*
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. September 2020 um 23:24 Uhr
Von: "Harald Anlauf"
An: "fortran" , "gcc-patches"
Cc: "Paul Richard Thomas"
Betreff: [PATCH] PR fortran/90903 [part2] Add runtime checking for
ok, thanks .
On 9/15/20 1:35 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
As stated in the PR, the Fortran 2018 standard removed the restriction
prohibiting ELEMENTAL RECURSIVE procedures. Adjust the relevant check.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for master?
Thanks,
Harald
PR fortran/97036 - [F2018] All
On 8/17/20 12:31 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Please find attached a patch for PR96436.
OK to commit?
Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this.
Regards,
Jerry
This look good, OK to commit.
Thanks,
Jerry
On 8/10/20 8:03 AM, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Hi folks,
long time, no see. I was asked by Damian to do some Coarray stuff in gfortran
so here is the first step on fixing a bug. The issue at hand is, that the
coarray handling is not propagated correc
OK to commit and Backport.
On 6/18/20 1:11 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Please find attached fix for PR95585.
OK to commit and backport?
Commit message:
Fortran : ICE in gfc_check_reshape PR95585
Issue an error where an array is used before its definition
instead of an ICE.
2020-06-18 Steven
OK to commit and backport.
On 6/30/20 11:12 PM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
Please find attached a patch which is a fix for PR95612. The original
patch is by Steve Kargl.
OK to commit and backport?
Commit message:
Fortran : ICE in gfc_check_pointer_assign PR95612
Output an error if the right ha
On 6/27/20 1:40 AM, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote:
Hi Mark,
Use -fdec-add-missing-indexes to enable feature. Also enabled by fdec.
A warning that the lower bound is being used for a mission dimension
is output unless suppressed by using -Wno-missing-index.
This is... seriously problemati
OK, and once again, thanks.
Jerry
On 6/17/20 12:27 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Another corner case of buffer overflows during name mangling found by
Gerhard. We now check that the new buffer sizes suffice.
The patch is on top of the patches for PRs 95687, 95688, 95689.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-lin
OK, and thanks for Patch.
On 6/23/20 2:08 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear all,
here's another case with a buffer that did overflow.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for master / backports?
Thanks,
Harald
PR fortran/95827 - Buffer overflows with PDTs and long symbols
With submodules and
15 matches
Mail list logo