ICE on wrong code [PR94192] commit

. It is still possible to change it. Best regards, Linus König

ICE on wrong code [PR94192]

regards, Linus König FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_8.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_2.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_8.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_2.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_8.f90 -O1

ICE on wrong colde [PR94192]

Hi, I fixed the style issues. However, omitting the checks for NULL produced several regressions in my previous tests. Best regards, Linus König diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index 23b5a2b4439..ca149c0dd00 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c +++ b/gcc/fortran

ICE on wrong code [PR94192]

Hi all, I'm new to gcc and this is my first patch. The idea is not have another resolution of a pointer if an error has occurred previously. I hope this meets all the criteria for a patch. In case anything is missing or wrong, I'm open to add to or change the patch. Best regards, Linus