Re: [PATCH] Add security_sensitive attribute to clean function stack and regs.

2016-04-04 Thread Marcos Díaz
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marcos Díaz <marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote: > (Ping and changelog fix) > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Marcos Díaz > <marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote: >> Hi, >>the attached patch adds

Re: [PATCH] Add security_sensitive attribute to clean function stack and regs.

2016-03-28 Thread Marcos Díaz
(Ping and changelog fix) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Marcos Díaz <marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote: > Hi, >the attached patch adds a new attribute 'security_sensitive' for functions. > The idea was discussed in PR middle-end/69976. > This attribute makes gc

[PATCH] Add security_sensitive attribute to clean function stack and regs.

2016-03-22 Thread Marcos Díaz
Hi, the attached patch adds a new attribute 'security_sensitive' for functions. The idea was discussed in PR middle-end/69976. This attribute makes gcc to emit clean up code at the function's epilogue. This clean-up code cleans the stack used by this function and that isn't needed anymore. It

Re: [patch] gcc fstack-protector-explicit

2014-09-17 Thread Marcos Díaz
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Marcos Díaz marcos.d...@tallertechnologies.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/19/14 08:06, Marcos Díaz wrote: Well, finally

Re: [patch] gcc fstack-protector-explicit

2014-07-02 Thread Marcos Díaz
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/19/14 08:06, Marcos Díaz wrote: Well, finally I have the assignment, could you please review this patch? Thanks. My first thought

Re: [patch] gcc fstack-protector-explicit

2014-05-12 Thread Marcos Díaz
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/19/14 08:06, Marcos Díaz wrote: Well, finally I have the assignment, could you please review this patch? Thanks. I'll take a look once we open up stage1 development again (should be soon as 4.9 is getting close to being

Re: [patch] gcc fstack-protector-explicit

2014-03-19 Thread Marcos Díaz
Well, finally I have the assignment, could you please review this patch? On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/19/13 07:04, Marcos Díaz wrote: My employer is working on the signature of the papers. Could someone please do the review meanwhile? I'd prefer

Re: [patch] gcc fstack-protector-explicit

2013-11-19 Thread Marcos Díaz
My employer is working on the signature of the papers. Could someone please do the review meanwhile? On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/18/13 13:05, Marcos Díaz wrote: Hi, the attached patch adds a new attribute and option flag to control when to do

[patch] gcc fstack-protector-explicit

2013-11-18 Thread Marcos Díaz
Hi, the attached patch adds a new attribute and option flag to control when to do stack protection. The new attribute (stack_protect) affects the behavior of gcc by forcing the stack protection of the function marked with the attribute if any of the options -fstack-protector,