On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Nov 13, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> >
> >> Attached is the patch for new -flive-patching=[inline-only-static |
> >> inline-clone] master option.
> >>
> >> '-fl
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Attached is the patch for new -flive-patching=[inline-only-static |
> inline-clone] master option.
>
> '-flive-patching=LEVEL'
> Control GCC's optimizations to provide a safe compilation for
> live-patching. Provides multiple-level
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
> > let me summarize some results from performance comparisons of Linux
> > kernels compiled with and without certain IPA optimizations.
>
> Thanks a lot for the summary.
>
> So, would it make sense to submit
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
> > On Oct 23, 2018, at 4:11 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> >>
> >> One question here, what’s the major benefit to prepare the patches
> >> manually?
> >
> > I could almost quote what you wrote below.
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the comments.
>
> >
> > thanks for the proposal. The others have already expressed some of my
> > worries and remarks, but I think it would be only right to write them
> > again. Especially since I am part of the team responsible for
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After more detailed study of GCC’s IPA optimizations, further study of the
> current available kernel live patching schemes and
> other live-patching user’s request, I came up with the following initial
> proposal in GCC to mainly support live-pa
