Jeff Law writes:
> On 10/24/2016 02:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>>> I would like to bump my patch that makes the
>>> `contrib/download_prerequisites` script verify the checksums of the
>>> downloaded
I would like to ping this patch of mine:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg00486.html
Thank you.
I would like to bump my patch that makes the
`contrib/download_prerequisites` script verify the checksums of
the downloaded packages and augments it with a few additional options.
All feedback I have received has been incorporated. Is it okay like
this?
Below is again the latest iteration of the
Martin Sebor writes:
> [...]
>
>> In-tree only the versions that download_prerequisite picks are
>> tested and guaranteed to work.
>
> I was made aware today that my recent patch for pr49905 broke
> bootstrap with MPFR 2.4:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01507.html
>
> In lig
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
>> Ok, I didn't know about the workflow. Do you think I should dike the
>> `--strip-sums` option out again then?
>
> I don't see any use for such an option. Anyone changing the versions
>
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
>> be cleaner to only include those checksums that are actually needed. On
>> the other hand, it means an increased maintenance burden each time the
>> version of the dependency is changed. In order to
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>>
>>> I have made an actual diff now, containing also the checksum files.
>>> I
>>
>> I don't think checksums of lots
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Moritz Klammler wrote:
>
>> gmp='gmp-4.3.2.tar.bz2'
>> mpfr='mpfr-2.4.2.tar.bz2'
>> mpc='mpc-0.8.1.tar.gz'
>> isl='isl-0.15.tar.bz2'
>
> These are not the versions used in t
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch adds an optimized route to the fpclassify builtin
> for floating point numbers which are similar to IEEE-754 in format.
>
> [...]
I might be the least competent person on this list to review this patch
but nevertheless read it out of interest and
There is a long-standing
[bug report](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439)
pointing out that the `download_prerequisites` script doesn't verify the
integrity of the packages it downloads. The original bug report is only
concerned about stability but for me, this is first and foremos
10 matches
Mail list logo
