On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:46:08AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > Fair enough, I didn't know whether to change the way it currently was
> > triggered. Do you think it should fall under -Wextra (I don't think it
> > falls under -Wall, since it isn't "easy to avoid or modify to prevent
> > the warnin
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:31:10PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Sam van Kampen via gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > +Wbitfield-enum-conversion
> > +C++ Var(warn_bitfield_enum_conversion) Init(1) Warning
> > +Warn about struct bit-fields being too small
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:56:05PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 06:37 AM, Sam van Kampen via gcc-patches wrote:
> > ..I just realised that the clang flag is -Wbitfield-enum-conversion, not
> > -Wenum-bitfield-conversion. Please apply the patch below instead, which
&
..I just realised that the clang flag is -Wbitfield-enum-conversion, not
-Wenum-bitfield-conversion. Please apply the patch below instead, which
has replaced the two words to remove the inconsistency.
2017-10-16 Sam van Kampen
* c-family/c.opt: Add a warning flag for struct bit-fields
This patch adds a warning flag for the warning described in bug report
#61414. My proposed warning flag is -Wenum-bitfield-conversion, which
corresponds with the warning flag that clang has for a similar warning.
2017-10-16 Sam van Kampen
* c-family/c.opt: Add a warning flag for struct
