Re: [PATCH, GCC-7, GCC-6][ARM][PR target/84826] Backport Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabihf

Hi Kyrill On 29/03/18 09:41, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi Sudi, On 28/03/18 15:04, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch is a request to backport r258777 and r258805 to gcc-7-branch and gcc-6-branch. The same ICE occurs in both the branches with -fstack-check. Thus the test case directive has been

[PATCH, GCC-7, GCC-6][ARM][PR target/84826] Backport Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabihf

-03/msg01120.html Testing : Regtested on both the branches with arm-none-linux-gnueabihf Is this ok for gcc-7 and gcc-6? Sudi ChangeLog entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-28 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> Backport from mainline 2018-03-22 Sudakshina Das

Re: [PATCH PR81647][AARCH64] Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch64-simd.md

Hi On 20/03/18 10:57, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi On 20/03/18 08:13, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 19 March 2018 at 19:55, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi On 19/03/18 14:29, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:57:46AM +, Sudi Das wrote: Hi This patch

Re: [PATCH][ARM][PR82989] Fix unexpected use of NEON instructions for shifts

On 21/03/18 11:40, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi On 21/03/18 08:51, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 20 March 2018 at 11:58, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi On 20/03/18 10:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 14/03/18 10:11, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch fixes PR82989 so t

[PATCH][AARCH64][PR target/84882] Add mno-strict-align

. Testing: Bootstrapped, regtested and added new tests that are copies of earlier tests checking -mstrict-align with opposite scan directives. Is this ok for trunk? Sudi *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-27 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * common/config/aarch64/aarch64-co

Re: [PATCH][ARM][PR target/84826] Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

On 23/03/18 13:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 23/03/18 13:31, Sudakshina Das wrote: On 23/03/18 09:12, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 23/03/18 08:47, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi Sudi, On 22 March 2018 at 18:26, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi On 22/03/18 16:52, Kyrill Tkachov

Re: [PATCH][ARM][PR target/84826] Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

On 23/03/18 09:12, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 23/03/18 08:47, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi Sudi, On 22 March 2018 at 18:26, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi On 22/03/18 16:52, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 22/03/18 16:20, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Kyrill On 22/03/18 16:08,

Re: [PATCH][ARM][PR target/84826] Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi On 22/03/18 16:52, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 22/03/18 16:20, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Kyrill On 22/03/18 16:08, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi Sudi, On 21/03/18 17:44, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The ICE in the bug report was happening because the macro USE_RETURN_INSN (FALSE) was returning

Re: [PATCH][ARM][PR target/84826] Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi Kyrill On 22/03/18 16:08, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi Sudi, On 21/03/18 17:44, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The ICE in the bug report was happening because the macro USE_RETURN_INSN (FALSE) was returning different values at different points in the compilation. This was internally occurring

Re: [Aarch64] Fix conditional branches with target far away.

Hi Sameera On 22/03/18 02:07, Sameera Deshpande wrote: Hi Sudakshina, As per the ARMv8 ARM, for the offset range (-1048576 ,1048572), the far branch instruction offset is inclusive of both the offsets. Hence, I am using <=||=> and not <||>= as it was in previous implementati

[PATCH][ARM][PR target/84826] Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on arm-linux-gnueabi

the reported test to the testsuite. Is this ok for trunk? Sudi ChangeLog entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-21 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> PR target/84826 * config/arm/arm.h (machine_function): Add static_chain_stack_bytes. * config/arm

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test pr82989.c for big endian and mthumb

Hi On 21/03/18 17:03, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 21/03/18 16:33, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 21 March 2018 at 13:11, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi The test pr82989.c which was added in one of previous commits is failing for mthumb and big-endian configurations. T

[PATCH][ARM] Fix test pr82989.c for big endian and mthumb

? Thanks Sudi *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-21 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> PR target/82989 * gcc.target/arm/pr82989.c: Change dg-scan-assembly directives. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr82989.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr82989.c index 6

Re: [PATCH][ARM][PR82989] Fix unexpected use of NEON instructions for shifts

Hi On 21/03/18 08:51, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 20 March 2018 at 11:58, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi On 20/03/18 10:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 14/03/18 10:11, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch fixes PR82989 so that we avoid NEON instructions when

Re: [PATCH][AARCH64] PR target/84521 Fix frame pointer corruption with -fomit-frame-pointer with __builtin_setjmp

as only AArch64 patch. This also has a mid change so cc'ing more people for approval. Sudi Thanks, James *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-14 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * builtins.c (expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver): Update condition to restore frame p

Re: [PATCH][ARM][PR82989] Fix unexpected use of NEON instructions for shifts

Hi On 20/03/18 10:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: On 14/03/18 10:11, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch fixes PR82989 so that we avoid NEON instructions when -mneon-for-64bits is not enabled. This is more of a short term fix for the real deeper problem of making and early decision

Re: [PATCH PR81647][AARCH64] Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch64-simd.md

Hi On 20/03/18 08:13, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 19 March 2018 at 19:55, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi On 19/03/18 14:29, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:57:46AM +, Sudi Das wrote: Hi This patch fixes the inconsistent behavior observed

Re: [PATCH PR81647][AARCH64] Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch64-simd.md

robably need a back-port to gcc-7-branch as well. OK. Let it soak on trunk for a while before the backport. Thanks. Committed to trunk as r258653. Will wait a week before backport. Sudi Thanks, James ChangeLog Entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2017-12-15 Sudakshina Das <sudi..

Re: [Aarch64] Fix conditional branches with target far away.

On 15/03/18 15:27, Sameera Deshpande wrote: Ping! On 28 February 2018 at 16:18, Sameera Deshpande wrote: On 27 February 2018 at 18:25, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Sameera Deshpande

[PATCH][AARCH64] PR target/84521 Fix frame pointer corruption with -fomit-frame-pointer with __builtin_setjmp

to be done for these builtins in the future. Testing: Bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and added new test. Is this ok for trunk? Sudi *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-14 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * builtins.c (expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver): Update con

[PATCH][ARM][PR82989] Fix unexpected use of NEON instructions for shifts

/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-14 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * config/arm/neon.md (ashldi3_neon): Update ?s for constraints to favor GPR over NEON registers. (di3_neon): Likewise. *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2018-03-14 Sudakshina Das <sudi...

Re: [PATCH PR81228][AARCH64][gcc-7] Backport r255625 : Fix ICE by adding LTGT

On 09/01/18 15:37, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch is only adding the missing LTGT to plug the ICE. This is a backport to r255625 of trunk. Testing done: Checked for regressions on bootstrapped aarch64-none-linux-gnu and added a new compile time test case that gives out LTGT to make

Re: [PATCH PR82096][gcc-7, gcc-6] Backport: Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

On 16/02/18 15:40, Sudakshina Das wrote: On 22/01/18 15:23, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi This is a patch to backport r256526 and r256941 (Fix case fix) of trunk to fix emit_store_flag_force () function to fix t

Re: [PATCH PR82096][gcc-7] Backport: Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

On 22/01/18 15:23, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi This is a patch to backport r256526 and r256941 (Fix case fix) of trunk to fix emit_store_flag_force () function to fix the ICE. The original discussion is at

Re: [PATCH PR81647][AARCH64][PING] Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch64-simd.md

PING On 15/12/17 11:57, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch fixes the inconsistent behavior observed at -O3 for the unordered comparisons. According to the online docs (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.2.0/gccint/Unary-and-Binary-Expressions.html), all of the following should not raise

[PATCH PR82096][gcc-7] Backport: Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

for gcc-7-branch? Testing : Ran regression testing with bootstrapped arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. Thanks Sudi ChangeLog entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-01-22 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> Backport from mainline: 2018-01-10 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com>

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test fail with conflicting -mfloat-abi

Hi Kyrill On 19/01/18 18:00, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 16/01/18 10:31, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Christophe On 12/01/18 18:32, Christophe Lyon wrote: Le 12 janv. 2018 15:26, "Sudakshina Das" <sudi@arm.com> a écrit : Hi This patch fixes my earlier test case that fails f

Re: [PATCH PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi Jeff On 12/01/18 23:00, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/12/2018 01:45 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi, On 11 January 2018 at 11:58, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi Jeff On 10/01/18 21:08, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/10/2018 09:25 AM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Jeff On 10/01/18

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test fail with conflicting -mfloat-abi

Hi Christophe On 12/01/18 18:32, Christophe Lyon wrote: Le 12 janv. 2018 15:26, "Sudakshina Das" <sudi@arm.com> a écrit : Hi This patch fixes my earlier test case that fails for arm-none-eabi with explicit user option for -mfloat-abi which conflict with the test case optio

[PATCH][ARM] Fix test fail with conflicting -mfloat-abi

confirm if this works for you? Thanks Sudi gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2018-01-12 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr82096.c: Add dg-skip-if directive. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr82096.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr8

Re: [PATCH PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi Jeff On 10/01/18 21:08, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/10/2018 09:25 AM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Jeff On 10/01/18 10:44, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Jeff On 09/01/18 23:43, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/05/2018 12:25 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Jeff On 05/01/18 18:44, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/04/2018 08

Re: [PATCH PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi Jeff On 10/01/18 10:44, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Jeff On 09/01/18 23:43, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/05/2018 12:25 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Jeff On 05/01/18 18:44, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/04/2018 08:35 AM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The bug reported a particular test di-longlong64-sync-1.c

Re: [PATCH PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi Jeff On 09/01/18 23:43, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/05/2018 12:25 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Jeff On 05/01/18 18:44, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/04/2018 08:35 AM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The bug reported a particular test di-longlong64-sync-1.c failing when run on arm-linux-gnueabi with options

[PATCH PR81228][AARCH64][gcc-7] Backport r255625 : Fix ICE by adding LTGT

? Thanks Sudi ChangeLog Entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2018-01-09 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> Backport from mainline: 2017-12-14 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> Bin Cheng <bin.ch...

Re: [PATCH PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi Jeff On 05/01/18 18:44, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/04/2018 08:35 AM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The bug reported a particular test di-longlong64-sync-1.c failing when run on arm-linux-gnueabi with options -mthumb -march=armv5t -O[g,1,2,3] and -mthumb -march=armv6 -O[g,1,2,3]. According to what I

Re: [PATCH PR81647][AARCH64] PING Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch64-simd.md

PING On 15/12/17 11:57, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch fixes the inconsistent behavior observed at -O3 for the unordered comparisons. According to the online docs (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-7.2.0/gccint/Unary-and-Binary-Expressions.html), all of the following should not raise

Re: [PATCH PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

Hi Kyrill On 04/01/18 16:36, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi Sudi, On 04/01/18 15:35, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi The bug reported a particular test di-longlong64-sync-1.c failing when run on arm-linux-gnueabi with options -mthumb -march=armv5t -O[g,1,2,3] and -mthumb -march=armv6 -O[g,1,2,3

Re: [PATCH PR82439][simplify-rtx] Simplify (x | y) == x -> (y & ~x) == 0

Hi Jeff On 04/01/18 18:30, Jeff Law wrote: On 01/03/2018 06:57 AM, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch add support for the missing transformation of (x | y) == x -> (y & ~x) == 0. The transformation for (x & y) == x case already exists in simplify-rtx.c since 2014 as of r218503 and

[PATCH PR82096] Fix ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

added new test cases. Sudi ChangeLog entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2017-01-04 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> PR target/82096 * optabs.c (expand_atomic_compare_and_swap): Change argument to emit_store_flag_force. *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2017-01-04

Re: [PATCH PR82439][simplify-rtx] Simplify (x | y) == x -> (y & ~x) == 0

Hi On 03/01/18 14:38, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Hi! On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:57:38PM +, Sudakshina Das wrote: This patch add support for the missing transformation of (x | y) == x -> (y & ~x) == 0. Testing done: Checked for regressions on bootstrapped aarch64-none-linux-gnu

[PATCH PR82439][simplify-rtx] Simplify (x | y) == x -> (y & ~x) == 0

or trunk? Sudi ChangeLog Entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2017-01-03 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> PR target/82439 * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_relational_operation_1): Add simplifications of (x|y) == x for BICS pattern. *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2017-

Re: Replying to an older patch ([PATCH] Fix failing test-case)

Hi Martin On 19/12/17 10:49, Martin Liška wrote: On 11/30/2017 12:03 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01157.html This patch fixed a test case switch-case-2.c. I am seeing switch-case-1.c failing on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof

Re: [PATCH PR81228][AARCH64] Fix ICE by adding LTGT in vec_cmp

On 14/12/17 10:38, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi On 13/12/17 16:56, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:45:33PM +, Sudi Das wrote: On 13/12/17 16:42, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch is a follow up to the existing discussions on https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07

[PATCH PR81647][AARCH64] Fix handling of Unordered Comparisons in aarch64-simd.md

angeLog *** 2017-12-15 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> PR target/81647 * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_cmp): Modify instructions for UNLT, UNLE, UNGT, UNGE, UNEQ, UNORDERED and ORDERED. *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2017-12-15 Sudakshina Das <

Re: [PATCH][ARM][gcc-7] Fix regression on soft float targets for armv8_2-fp16-move-2.c

Hi On 14/12/17 18:26, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 14/12/17 18:17, Sudi Das wrote: Hi On 14/12/17 17:37, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 14 December 2017 at 17:05, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >> This patch is a follow up on my previous patch with r255

Re: [PATCH][ARM][gcc-7] Fix regression on soft float targets for armv8_2-fp16-move-2.c

Hi On 14/12/17 17:37, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 14 December 2017 at 17:05, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: Hi This patch is a follow up on my previous patch with r255536 that was a back-port for fixing a wrong code generation (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg0220

[PATCH][ARM][gcc-7] Fix regression on soft float targets for armv8_2-fp16-move-2.c

Hi This patch is a follow up on my previous patch with r255536 that was a back-port for fixing a wrong code generation (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02209.html). As pointed out by Christophe Lyon (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00718.html) the test case

Re: [PATCH PR81228][AARCH64] Fix ICE by adding LTGT in vec_cmp

Hi On 13/12/17 16:56, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:45:33PM +, Sudi Das wrote: On 13/12/17 16:42, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch is a follow up to the existing discussions on https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01904.html Bin had earlier submitted

Re: [PATCH PR81228][AARCH64] Fix ICE by adding LTGT in vec_cmp

On 13/12/17 16:42, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch is a follow up to the existing discussions on https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg01904.html Bin had earlier submitted a patch to fix the ICE that occurs because of the missing LTGT in aarch64-simd.md. That discussion opened up

[PATCH PR81228][AARCH64] Fix ICE by adding LTGT in vec_cmp

on bootstrapped aarch64-none-linux-gnu and added a new compile time test case that gives out LTGT to make sure it doesn't ICE. Is this ok for trunk? Thanks Sudi ChangeLog Entries: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2017-12-13 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> Bin Cheng <bin.ch..

Re: [PATCH][ARM][gcc-7] Fix wrong code by arm_final_prescan with fp16 move instructions

Hi Christophe On 12/12/17 09:59, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi, On 11 December 2017 at 18:12, Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> wrote: On 30/11/17 16:01, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch is the fix for gcc-7 for the same issue as mentioned in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2

Re: [PATCH][ARM][gcc-7] Fix wrong code by arm_final_prescan with fp16 move instructions

On 30/11/17 16:01, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi This patch is the fix for gcc-7 for the same issue as mentioned in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02209.html For the following test case: __fp16 test_select (__fp16 a, __fp16 b, __fp16 c) {   return (a < b) ? b : c; } when compi

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix wrong code by arm_final_prescan with fp16 move instructions

On 30/11/17 16:07, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 30/11/17 16:06, Sudakshina Das wrote: Hi Kyrill On 27/11/17 12:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi Sudi, > > On 24/11/17 14:57, Sudi Das wrote: >> Hi >> >> For the following test case: >> __fp16 >> te

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix wrong code by arm_final_prescan with fp16 move instructions

patch on that branch as well if so? I have tested the patch and also sent a new patch request for gcc-7 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02577.html Thanks Sudi Thanks, Kyrill Sudi ChangeLog entry are as follow: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2017-11-24 Sudakshina Das <sudi...

[PATCH][ARM][gcc-7] Fix wrong code by arm_final_prescan with fp16 move instructions

VMOVs. This patch fixes this problem by making *movhf_vfp_fp16 unconditional. Testing done: Add a new test case and checked for regressions on bootstrapped arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. Is this ok for gcc-7? Sudi ChangeLog entry are as follow: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2017-11-30 Sudakshina Das

Re: Replying to an older patch ([PATCH] Fix failing test-case)

On 30/11/17 11:03, Sudakshina Das wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01157.html This patch fixed a test case switch-case-2.c. I am seeing switch-case-1.c failing on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand ";; basic

Replying to an older patch ([PATCH] Fix failing test-case)

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01157.html This patch fixed a test case switch-case-2.c. I am seeing switch-case-1.c failing on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand ";; basic block[^\\n]*count 2000" 1 (found 0 times)

[PATCH][ARM] Fix wrong code by arm_final_prescan with fp16 move instructions

eabihf. Is this ok for trunk? Sudi ChangeLog entry are as follow: *** gcc/ChangeLog *** 2017-11-24 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * config/arm/vfp.md (*movhf_vfp_fp16): Add conds attribute. *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2017-11-24 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com>

[PATCH] Add myself as GCC maintainer

Added myself as GCC maintainer with r255071 *** ChangeLog *** 2017-11-22 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself. Thanks Sudi diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 13b0321..adaec62 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c

the form! :) Sudi Kyrill *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2017-11-22 Sudakshina Das <sudi@arm.com> * gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c: Add -mfloat-abi=hard option. From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 2:20 PM To: Christ

<    1   2