On 2024-07-23 09:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Gentle ping :)
As mentioned in the ticket, I would like to target this to trunk and
releases/gcc-14.
OK.
Richard.
Pushed as releases/gcc-14.1.0-331-ga544898f6dd and
basepoints/gcc-15-2224
Gentle ping :)
As mentioned in the ticket, I would like to target this to trunk and
releases/gcc-14.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-07-15 12:16, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
As the test case requires +-Inf and NaN to work and -ffast-math is added
by default for arm-none-eabi, re-enable
On 2024-07-19 17:22, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 19/07/2024 16:10, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
On 2024-07-19 16:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 19/07/2024 14:07, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-14?
--
On Cortex-A7 with -mfloat-abi=hard and -mfpu=neon
On 2024-07-19 16:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 19/07/2024 14:07, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-14?
--
On Cortex-A7 with -mfloat-abi=hard and -mfpu=neon, the following
instructions are generated for the test case:
vldrd16, .L3
vst1.32
On 2024-07-10 18:41, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 10/07/2024 17:26, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Is this ok for the following branches?
- trunk
- releases/gcc-14
- releases/gcc-13
--
Since r13-1006-g2005b9b888eeac, the test case copysign_softfloat_1.c
no longer contains any lsr
On 2024-06-11 15:59, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 10/06/2024 15:04, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Properly handle zero and sign extension for Armv8-M.baseline as
Cortex-M23 can have the security extension active.
Currently, there is an internal compiler error on Cortex-M23 for the
epilog
On 2024-06-11 16:00, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 10/06/2024 15:04, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
For Armv8.1-M, the clearing of the registers is handled differently than
for Armv8-M, so update the test case accordingly.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/115253
*
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the review!
Please see my questions below.
On 2024-06-10 12:37, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
Hi Torbjorn,
Thanks for this, I have some comments below.
On 07/06/2024 09:56, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Properly handle zero and sign extension for Armv8-M.baseline as
Cortex-M23
: d9c89402b54be4c15bb3c7bcce3465f534746204
releases/gcc-11: 08ca81e4b49bda153d678a372df7f7143a94f4ad
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-22 13:54, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 22/05/2024 12:14, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hello Richard,
Thanks for the reply.
From my point of view, at least the -fshort-enums
regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-22 12:55, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 06/05/2024 12:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it to the
following branches:
- releases/gcc-11
- releases/gcc-12
- releases/gcc-13
- releases/gcc-14
- trunk
Gentle ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-14 13:01, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if the previous "ok" from Richard on the v1 is enough for
this or if there needs another approval.
Adding extra maintainers since Richard Earnshaw appears to be busy the
past wee
Hi,
I'm not sure if the previous "ok" from Richard on the v1 is enough for
this or if there needs another approval.
Adding extra maintainers since Richard Earnshaw appears to be busy the
past weeks.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-06 13:50, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
H
Hi,
Forgot to mention when I sent the patch that I would like to commit it
to the following branches:
- releases/gcc-11
- releases/gcc-12
- releases/gcc-13
- releases/gcc-14
- trunk
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-05-02 12:50, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing
On 2024-04-30 17:11, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 27/04/2024 15:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Add regression test to the existing zero/sign extend tests for CMSE to
verify that r0, r1, r2 and r3 are properly extended, not just r0.
Test is done using -O0 to ensure the instructions are
Hi,
On 2024-04-25 16:25, Richard Ball wrote:
Hi Torbjorn,
Thanks very much for the comments.
I think given that the code that handles this, is within a
FOREACH_FUNCTION_ARGS loop.
It seems a fairly safe assumption that if the code works for one that it
will work for all.
To go back and add
Hi,
On 2024-04-24 17:55, Richard Ball wrote:
This patch makes the following changes:
1) When calling a secure function from non-secure code then any arguments
smaller than 32-bits that are passed in registers are zero- or
sign-extended.
2) After a non-secure function returns into secure
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-03-25 15:59, Yvan ROUX - foss wrote:
Ping!
Rgds,
Yvan
From: Torbjorn SVENSSON - foss
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 11:32 AM
To: David Malcolm; Alexandre Oliva
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Yvan ROUX - foss
Subject
On 2024-03-17 18:48, Mike Stump wrote:
On Mar 10, 2024, at 10:26 AM, Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
Ok for trunk?
Ok.
Pushed as basepoints/gcc-14-9513-g58753dba800 to trunk.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-03-10 18:26, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Ok for trunk?
--
As the tests assume that strndup() is visible (only part of
POSIX.1-2008) define the guard to ensure that it's visible. Currently,
glibc appears to always have this defined in C++, newlib does not.
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-03-08 10:14, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-02-22 09:51, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-02-07 17:21, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport
On 2024-03-12 14:21, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/11/24 06:23, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Changes compared to v1:
- Added reference to r14-6517-gb7e4a4c626e in dg-bogus comment
- Changed arm-*-* to short_enums in target selector
- Updated commit message to align with above changes
As the entire
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-02-22 09:51, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-02-07 17:21, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 3cbab07b08d2f3a3ed34b6ec12e67727c59d285c to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures
On 2024-03-01 15:58, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 19/02/2024 09:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13?
Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression.
Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x.
Jakub has just
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-02-07 17:19, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport b7e4a4c626eeeb32c291d5bbbaa148c5081b6bfd to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL:
gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251
Ping!
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2024-02-07 17:21, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 3cbab07b08d2f3a3ed34b6ec12e67727c59d285c to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-enum-1.c (test for bogus messages
On 2024-02-15 18:18, Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 15, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
Ok for trunk?
Ok.
Pushed as 8e8c2d2b34971bb29e74341a3efc625f1db06639.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR113278
* c-c++-common/analyzer/fileno-1.c: Define _POSIX_SOURCE.
*
On 2024-02-11 20:01, Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 10, 2024, at 7:21 AM, Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
I have confirmed that this updated pr97969.c file still hangs with
gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2020-q2-update as mentioned in comment 2 of PR97969.
Ok for trunk?
Ok.
Pushed as
On 2024-02-09 19:57, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/7/24 11:24, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 0d24289d129639efdc79338a64188d6d404375e8 to
releases/gcc-13?
OK.
Pushed as 583bd84075d23cde5fd489ab726093060870d773.
On 2024-02-09 11:34, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:33 AM Torbjorn SVENSSON
wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 2f20d6296087cae51f55eeecb3efefe786191fd6 to
releases/gcc-13?
Yes.
Pushed as 5b3dcff46780192a2e526bc434d61c8626898050.
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 2f20d6296087cae51f55eeecb3efefe786191fd6 to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see about 150 failures on arm-none-eabi, an
example of them is:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s000.c (test for excess errors)
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2023-05-24 11:02,
On 2024-02-07 17:36, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:25, Torbjorn SVENSSON
mailto:torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport e39b3e02c27bd771a07e385f9672ecf1a45ced77 to
releases/gcc-13?
It would als
On 2024-02-09 01:07, Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 8, 2024, at 9:44 AM, Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
Changes since v1:
- Replaced .* with [^\r\n]* to avoid matching newline.
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13?
Ok.
Pushed as 1175d1b35ce7bf8ee7c9b37b334370f01eb95335 and
On 2024-02-07 20:46, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/7/24 11:22, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 71804526d3a71a8c0f189a89ce3aa615784bfd8b to
releases/gcc-13?
OK.
Pushed as eae51472f68d9f922aa3a1a636f81467bfdae87a.
On 2024-02-07 17:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:31, Torbjorn SVENSSON
mailto:torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 62b29347c38394ae32858f2301aa9aa65205984e,
2a4d9e4f533c77870cc0eb60fbbd8047da
On 2024-02-07 18:13, Andrew Pinski (QUIC) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Torbjorn SVENSSON
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 8:23 AM
To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) ; gcc-
patc...@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Yvan Roux
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix contracts-tmpl-spec2.C on targets where plain
char
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 62b29347c38394ae32858f2301aa9aa65205984e,
2a4d9e4f533c77870cc0eb60fbbd8047da4c7386 and
ba0cde8ba2d93b7193050eb5ef3cc6f7a2cdfe61 to releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/compare_exchange_padding.cc
Hi,
Is it okay to backport e39b3e02c27bd771a07e385f9672ecf1a45ced77 to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see this failure on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/110807.cc (test for excess errors)
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2023-11-09 02:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 0d24289d129639efdc79338a64188d6d404375e8 to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wuse-after-free3.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wuse-after-free3.C -std=gnu++17 (test for
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 6e15e4e1abed02443a27a69455f4bfa49457c99e to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see this failure on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: g++.dg/contracts/contracts-tmpl-spec2.C output pattern test
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2023-11-26 03:57, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Since
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 71804526d3a71a8c0f189a89ce3aa615784bfd8b to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: g++.dg/contracts/contracts-ctor-dtor2.C(test for errors, line 23)
FAIL: g++.dg/contracts/contracts-ctor-dtor2.C(test for errors,
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 3cbab07b08d2f3a3ed34b6ec12e67727c59d285c to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-enum-1.c (test for bogus messages, line 26)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-enum-1.c (test for bogus messages,
Hi,
Is it okay to backport b7e4a4c626eeeb32c291d5bbbaa148c5081b6bfd to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL:
gcc.dg/analyzer/null-deref-pr108251-smp_fetch_ssl_fc_has_early-O2.c
(test for excess errors)
FAIL:
On 2023-01-12 16:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 19/09/2022 17:16, Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
In the test case, it's clearly written that intrinsics is not
implemented on arm*. A simple xfail does not help since there are
link error and that would cause an UNRESOLVED testcase
On 2022-11-28 12:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/25/22 14:03, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606528.html
ok, thanks!
Pushed.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-11-17 14:20, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
v1 -> v2:
Paths without
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606528.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-11-17 14:20, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
v1 -> v2:
Paths without "C:" part can still be absolute if they start with / or
\ on Windows.
v2 -> v3:
Use alternative approach by having
Pushed after off-list approval from Jeff Law.
On 2022-11-17 17:44, Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/604896.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-11-02 19:16, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https
Hi,
On 2022-11-20 21:31, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/2/22 12:21, Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604062.html
Ok for trunk?
OK. Sorry for the delay.
Thanks for the review.
Pushed.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
jeff
On 2022-11-18 09:14, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 6:09 PM Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/604895.html
Ok for trunk?
OK.
Pushed.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-11-02 19:13, Torbjorn
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/604895.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-11-02 19:13, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602844.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-25
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/604898.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-11-02 19:21, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604062.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-20
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/604896.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-11-02 19:16, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604312.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-25
Hi,
On 2022-11-16 03:11, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
How was r13-2619-g34b9a03353d3fd "gcov: Respect triplet when looking
for gcov" tested? I'm having a hard time believing it was tested with
a *cross-compiler* *in-build-tree*. I think it was only tested for
the special-case of an installed
Hi Nathan,
On 2022-11-08 00:03, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/3/22 11:06, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
On 2022-11-03 15:17, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/28/22 05:15, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
On Windows, the ':' character is special and when the module name is
a single character, like
On 2022-11-03 10:44, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Torbjorn SVENSSON
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 6:19 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov
Subject: PING^1 [PATCH] arm: Allow to override location of .gnu.sgstubs
section
Hi,
Ping, https
On 2022-11-03 15:09, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/3/22 09:48, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hello Nathan,
On 2022-11-03 14:13, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/3/22 05:37, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
v1 -> v2:
Updated expression in bad-mapper-3.C
Ok for trunk?
---
Without the patch, the out
On 2022-11-03 15:17, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/28/22 05:15, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
On Windows, the ':' character is special and when the module name is
a single character, like 'A', then the flatname would be (for
example) 'A:Foo'. On Windows, 'A:Foo' is treated as an absolute
path by
Hello Nathan,
On 2022-11-03 14:13, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/3/22 05:37, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
v1 -> v2:
Updated expression in bad-mapper-3.C
Ok for trunk?
---
Without the patch, the output for bad-mapper-3.C would be:
/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/bad-mapper-3.C:2:1: error:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604062.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-20 22:48, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
For systems with HAVE_DOS_BASED_FILE_SYSTEM set, only override the
pointer if the backslash pattern matches.
Output without this
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603878.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-19 11:42, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Depending on the DejaGNU board definition, the .gnu.sgstubs section
might be placed on different locations in order to suite the target.
With this
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604312.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-25 17:15, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Without this patch, the following error is reported on Windows:
In file included from
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602844.html
Ok for trunk?
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-25 16:24, Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603544.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-14
On 2022-10-26 22:26, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 2022-10-25 06:01, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
In commit 081c96621da, the call to resize_reg_info() was moved before
the call to remove_scratches() and the latter one can increase the
number of regs and that would cause an out of bounds usage on
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603544.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-14 09:42, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602843.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-05 11:17, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote
On 2022-10-24 10:07, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Torbj?rn SVENSSON wrote:
When generating the makefile, make sure that the paths are quoted so
that a native Windows path works within Cygwin.
Without this patch, this error is reported by the DejaGNU test suite:
make:
On 2022-10-20 20:19, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch stops reporting fails for Arm targets with single
precision floating point unit for types wider than 32 bits (the width
of float on arm-none-eabi).
As reported in PR102017,
Hi Christophe,
On 2022-10-19 11:52, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Torbjörn,
This looks like a nice improvement to me ;-)
On 10/19/22 11:42, Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
Depending on the DejaGNU board definition, the .gnu.sgstubs section
might be placed on different locations in order
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603054.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-07 15:28, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
This patch stops reporting fails for Arm targets with single
precision floating point unit for types wider than 32 bits (the width
of float on
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602843.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-10-05 11:17, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602111.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-23 14:03, Torbjörn SVENSSON
On 2022-10-05 11:51, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi Torbjörn,
-Original Message-
From: Torbjorn SVENSSON
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 10:28 AM
To: Kyrylo Tkachov
Cc: Yvan Roux
Subject: Fwd: PING^1 [PATCH] testsuite: 'b' instruction can't do long enough
jumps
Hi Kyrill,
I checked
Hi,
On 2022-10-05 11:34, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 9/29/22 17:38, Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
When running the DejaGNU testsuite on a toolchain built for native
Windows, the path /dev/null can't be used to open a stream to void.
On native Windows, the resource is
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602534.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-29 19:38, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
When running the DejaGNU testsuite on a toolchain built for native
Windows, the path /dev/null can't be used to open a stream to void.
On native
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602111.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-23 14:03, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
For some test cases, it's required that the optional module mapper
"g++-mapper-server" is built. As the server is not required, the
test cases
Hi,
Ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602541.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-29 20:07, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
When the mapper can't be executed, Windows report the error like:
.../bad-mapper-1.C: error: failed CreateProcess mapper 'this-will-not-work'
On
Hi,
I'm really sorry for the mess.
I did test my patch, but I just looked for the PASS/FAIL for the excess
errors and missed that there was an error with the pattern.
In the end, the patch that you pushed is much better. Thanks for fixing
the issue in my absence.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On
Hi Christophe!
On 2022-09-28 13:55, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi!
On 9/28/22 11:17, Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601829.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-19 18:30, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
After moving
Hi,
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601831.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-19 18:57, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
The linker script should not be prefixed with "-Wl," - it's not an
input file and does not interfere with the new dump output filename
strategy.
Hi,
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601829.html
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-19 18:30, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
After moving the testglue in commit 9d503515cee, the jump to exit and
abort is too far for the 'b' instruction on Cortex-M0. As most of the
C
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your review.
Comments below.
On 2022-09-23 19:34, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches writes:
Checking that the triplet matches arm*-*-eabi (or msp430-*-*) is not
enough to know if the execution will enter an endless loop, or if it
will give a
Hi Joseph,
On 2022-09-23 00:42, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Torbjörn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch stops reporting fails for Arm targets with single
precision floating point unit for types wider than 32 bits (the width
of float on arm-none-eabi).
As reported in
Hi all,
Appears that this is just a problem for gcc11 (and perhaps gcc12?).
Master already has the needed implementation, so the patch below is not
needed.
Sorry for the buzz.
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2022-09-15 08:54, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
-fzero-call-used-regs=all and
On 2022-09-12 10:40, Martin Liška wrote:
On 9/12/22 09:06, Torbjorn SVENSSON via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 2022-09-11 21:38, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 11/09/2022 à 18:04, Torbjorn SVENSSON a écrit :
Can you fix it for me and submit it or do you want me to send a v3?
For trivial things like
On 2022-09-11 21:38, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 11/09/2022 à 18:04, Torbjorn SVENSSON a écrit :
Can you fix it for me and submit it or do you want me to send a v3?
For trivial things like this, there is no need for a v3 (nor was there
for a v2).
Do you miss a git write account and need
Hi,
On 2022-09-11 16:34, Mikael Morin wrote:
Hello,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp
index 82376d90ac2..a55ce234f6e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
taget-tree).
Torbjörn
On 27/11/2018 19:40, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:02:49PM +, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
>> Attached is a small patch that, in case of inline assembler code,
>> indicates that the function stack usage is uncertain due to inli
Hi,
Attached is a small patch that, in case of inline assembler code,
indicates that the function stack usage is uncertain due to inline
assembler.
The test suite are using "nop" as an assembler instruction on all
targets, is this acceptable or is there a better way to test this?
Patch has
85 matches
Mail list logo
