Quoting Joern Rennecke :
The return value is a pointer to a function, to be used for adjusting
instruction length in the place of ADJUST_INSN_LENGTHS - and where it
is missing, or zero if no such functionis required.
(I first thought of having separate target hooks for everything, but then
I re
Quoting Georg-Johann Lay :
+ * return stack_mem_p (operands[0]) ? \"push 0" : \"clrmem %0\";
---^
Isn't there a backslash missing?
Attached is the amended patch. Again, bootstrapped on i686-pc-linux-gnu .
2011-09-19 J"orn Rennecke
Quoting Georg-Johann Lay :
+ * return stack_mem_p (operands[0]) ? \"push 0" : \"clrmem %0\";
---^
Isn't there a backslash missing?
Oops, yes, there is.
Quoting Paolo Bonzini :
Unless I'm missing something, this is going all the way down to the end
of the function, bypassing the CFG, so it is neither efficient nor
correct.
new_insn hasn't been emitted yet, hence it is a single insn or a short
chain of insn to implement a no-op move (for a post
