Re: (g)fortran support for MPX (was: Re: [PATCH, MPX, 2/X] Pointers Checker [8/25] Languages support)

2013-11-18 Thread Ilya Enkovich
2013/11/18 Tobias Burnus : > Ilya Enkovich wrote: >> >> The issue is that users do not get what expect. I do not want someone >> having mixed codes get instrumentation for his Java/Fortran/Ada >> functions which slows them down and does nothing useful. What is the >> point to allow checks of pointe

(g)fortran support for MPX (was: Re: [PATCH, MPX, 2/X] Pointers Checker [8/25] Languages support)

2013-11-18 Thread Tobias Burnus
Ilya Enkovich wrote: The issue is that users do not get what expect. I do not want someone having mixed codes get instrumentation for his Java/Fortran/Ada functions which slows them down and does nothing useful. What is the point to allow checks of pointer bounds for language with no pointers?