Re: *Ping* Introduce -finline-arg-packing

2019-12-21 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Jakub, This patch broke: +FAIL: compiler driver --help=fortran option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]\$" absent from output: " -finline-arg-packingPerform argument packing inline" That test verifies that the help texts of all options are terminated with dot or semicolon. Thanks, and sorry for

Re: *Ping* Introduce -finline-arg-packing

2019-12-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:11:25PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 10.12.19 um 22:22 schrieb Thomas Koenig: > > Steve made an excellent suggestion: -finline-arg-packing . > > > > So, OK with that change? > > In other words, is > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00485.html > >

Re: *Ping* Introduce -finline-arg-packing

2019-12-15 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:11:25PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 10.12.19 um 22:22 schrieb Thomas Koenig: > > Steve made an excellent suggestion: -finline-arg-packing . > > > > So, OK with that change? > > In other words, is > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00485.html > >

*Ping* Introduce -finline-arg-packing

2019-12-15 Thread Thomas Koenig
Am 10.12.19 um 22:22 schrieb Thomas Koenig: Steve made an excellent suggestion: -finline-arg-packing . So, OK with that change? In other words, is https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00485.html OK with renaming the option to -finline-arg-packing ? Regards Thomas