Re: *ping* [patch, fortran, 4.9] Dependency and string length calculation improvements

2013-03-28 Thread Thomas Koenig
I wrote: Ping**2? I'd like to get these patches committed, if possible, to clear up my trees a little bit :-) Thomas *ping* Slightly updated patch below, with a better test case as suggested by Dominique. OK for trunk? 2013-03-16 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org PR

Re: *ping* [patch, fortran, 4.9] Dependency and string length calculation improvements

2013-03-28 Thread Tobias Burnus
Thomas Koenig wrote: below is a patch which improves dependency checking for array assignments and calculation of string lengths. Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested implementing the function bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *); or something

Re: *ping* [patch, fortran, 4.9] Dependency and string length calculation improvements

2013-03-28 Thread Mikael Morin
Le 28/03/2013 18:48, Tobias Burnus a écrit : Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested implementing the function bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *); or something similarly named. It should return true, if the expression is known to be noncontiguous. I

Re: *ping* [patch, fortran, 4.9] Dependency and string length calculation improvements

2013-03-28 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Tobias, Talking about dependencies, I wonder whether you would be interested implementing the function bool gfc_simply_noncontiguous (gfc_expr *); or something similarly named. If you will work on it, please tell me - Sounds interesting. I'll give it a shot. Thomas

*ping* [patch, fortran, 4.9] Dependency and string length calculation improvements

2013-03-25 Thread Thomas Koenig
*ping* Slightly updated patch below, with a better test case as suggested by Dominique. OK for trunk? 2013-03-16 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/45159 * gfortran.h (gfc_dep_difference): Add prototype. * dependency.c (discard_nops): New function.