On 20 January 2015 at 15:24, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Here is an updated version, where I have removed a few more useless
> variables than you noticed: the [u]int64x1 as well as the 128 bits
> ones.
OK /Marcus
t;
>> Though never used, poly seems to have sneaked in here too.
> Indeed, sorry for that.
> I rushed to have as many tests as possible ready before stage 4, but
> obviously I missed a few cleanups.
>
Here is an updated version, where I have removed a few more useless
variables than you noticed: the [u]int64x1 as wel
On 16 January 2015 at 17:07, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> On 13/01/15 15:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>>
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vXXXhn.inc: New file.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vraddhn.c: New file.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics
On 13/01/15 15:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vXXXhn.inc: New file.
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vraddhn.c: New file.
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vrsubhn.c: New file.
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intri
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vXXXhn.inc: New file.
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vraddhn.c: New file.
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vrsubhn.c: New file.
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vsubhn.c: New file.
* gcc.target/a