Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

Nathan Sidwell writes: > It is not a complete implementation. The major missing pieces are: [...] Would now be a good time to start reporting bugs in bugzilla so that things don't fall through the cracks? Is so, would it make sense to add the "c++ modules" component to bugzilla?

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On Nov 3, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > Here is the implementation of C++20 modules that I have been developing on > the devel/c++-modules branch over the last few years. I was just recently wondering about this. Congratulations. > It is some 25K new lines of code (plus testsuit

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

Nathan Sidwell writes: > The repo is providing a mechanism by which two processes can synchronize > on a fixed location in the file system that is not /. You need such a > capability as the file system is the bulk transfer mechanism. > > The alternatives are to always use absolute paths, or r

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On November 5, 2020 4:25:23 PM GMT+01:00, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >On 11/5/20 8:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >> Moving the module mapper to a more easily (build-)testable location >> and to a place where host dependences can be more easily fixed >> & customized than in a bootstrapped directory wou

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On 11/5/20 2:08 AM, Boris Kolpackov wrote: To give an example of such a likely change, currently the mapper has a notion of the central module repository directory that is used to resolve all the relative CMI (compiled module interface[1]) paths (even paths like ./foo.gcm). However, this model

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On 11/5/20 8:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Moving the module mapper to a more easily (build-)testable location and to a place where host dependences can be more easily fixed & customized than in a bootstrapped directory would be nice. Thus, I think the module mapper should be in the toplevel som

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 16:12 -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote: [...] [CCing Joseph] > I have bootstrapped and tested on: > x86_64-linux > aarch64-linux > powerpc8le-linux > powerpc8-aix > > Iain Sandoe has been regularly bootstrapping on x86_64- > darwin. Joseph > Myers graciously built for i686-mi

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:12 PM Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > Here is the implementation of C++20 modules that I have been developing > on the devel/c++-modules branch over the last few years. > > It is not a complete implementation. The major missing pieces are: > > 1) Private Module Fragment >T

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

Nathan Sidwell writes: > Here is the implementation of C++20 modules that I have been developing > on the devel/c++-modules branch over the last few years. Congrats on reaching this point. > It is not a complete implementation. The major missing pieces are: > > [...] Building C++20 modules

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On 11/4/20 9:15 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:50 AM Nathan Sidwell > wrote: We can; apparently the necessary incantation is to #define INCLUDE_ALGORITHM thanks that's fixed the build problem. And working around the i386 error I get a working toolc

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:50 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 11/4/20 7:30 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > > rechecking the compile-farm page, I see gcc45 is a 686 machine, I'll try > > that. > > yeah, that didn't work. There's compilation errors in > ../../../src/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h abou

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On 11/4/20 7:30 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: rechecking the compile-farm page, I see gcc45 is a 686 machine, I'll try that. yeah, that didn't work. There's compilation errors in ../../../src/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h about missing initializers. and then ... In file included from /usr

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On 11/3/20 10:14 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Tue, 3 Nov 2020, Nathan Sidwell wrote: I have bootstrapped and tested on: x86_64-linux aarch64-linux powerpc8le-linux powerpc8-aix Iain Sandoe has been regularly bootstrapping on x86_64-darwin. Joseph Myers graciously built for i686-mingw hos

Re: [00/32] C++ 20 Modules

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Here is the implementation of C++20 modules that I have been developing on the > devel/c++-modules branch over the last few years. Ow. > I have bootstrapped and tested on: > x86_64-linux > aarch64-linux > powerpc8le-linux > powerpc8-aix > > Iain Sandoe

[00/32] C++ 20 Modules

Here is the implementation of C++20 modules that I have been developing on the devel/c++-modules branch over the last few years. It is not a complete implementation. The major missing pieces are: 1) Private Module Fragment The syntax is recognized and a sorry emitted 2) textually parsing a