Hello,
On 14.03.2016 19:45, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/14/2016 05:23 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface,
saying
we can't move an insn writing the si register through a vector insn,
On 03/14/2016 05:23 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface, saying
we can't move an insn writing the si register through a vector insn, and the
liveness analysis, saying we can. The
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface, saying
> we can't move an insn writing the si register through a vector insn, and the
> liveness analysis, saying we can. The latter doesn't take into account
>
Hello,
In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface,
saying we can't move an insn writing the si register through a vector insn,
and the liveness analysis, saying we can. The latter doesn't take into
account implicit_reg_pending_clobbers set calculated in sched-deps
