Re: [2/9] Add a REG_NREGS macro

Jeff Law writes: > On 05/18/2015 12:13 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> This patch adds a REG_NREGS macro that by the end of the series >> will simply be an rtx field access. The definition in this patch >> is just a placeholder (and so I haven't tried to avoid the double >> evaluation of the para

Re: [2/9] Add a REG_NREGS macro

On 05/18/2015 12:13 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: This patch adds a REG_NREGS macro that by the end of the series will simply be an rtx field access. The definition in this patch is just a placeholder (and so I haven't tried to avoid the double evaluation of the parameter). The diff has extra co

[2/9] Add a REG_NREGS macro

This patch adds a REG_NREGS macro that by the end of the series will simply be an rtx field access. The definition in this patch is just a placeholder (and so I haven't tried to avoid the double evaluation of the parameter). The diff has extra context because in most cases it makes it obvious tha