Hi Kyrill,
On Monday 2014-10-20 10:41, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Thank you. Can you please also update gcc-5/changes.html on the
web side of things?
Sure, but I'm not sure how to get access to the web pages cvs.
Could you point me to the magic runes please?
does https://gcc.gnu.org/about.html
On 27/10/14 11:41, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
On Monday 2014-10-20 10:41, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Thank you. Can you please also update gcc-5/changes.html on the
web side of things?
Sure, but I'm not sure how to get access to the web pages cvs.
Could you point me to the magic runes
On 19/10/14 21:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Friday 2014-10-10 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This adds a new configure-time option --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 that
will enable the Cortex-A53 erratum fix by default
so you don't have to specify -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 every time.
Documentation
On Friday 2014-10-10 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This adds a new configure-time option --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 that
will enable the Cortex-A53 erratum fix by default
so you don't have to specify -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 every time.
Documentation in install.texi is added.
Thank you.
Hi all,
This adds a new configure-time option --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 that
will enable the Cortex-A53 erratum fix by default
so you don't have to specify -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 every time.
Documentation in install.texi is added.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2014-10-10 Kyrylo
On 10 October 2014 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
This adds a new configure-time option --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 that
will enable the Cortex-A53 erratum fix by default
so you don't have to specify -mfix-cortex-a53-835769 every time.
Documentation in
On 10/10/14 13:25, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 10 October 2014 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
This adds a new configure-time option --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 that
will enable the Cortex-A53 erratum fix by default
so you don't have to specify
On 10 October 2014 13:38, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Thanks Marcus, committed as r216076.
Can this go to the 4.9 branch as well? It applies cleanly there (with
appropriately regenerated configure) and I tested it there with bootstraps
with and without the option.
Yes that's
