Hi,
Please see attached the patches to add -moutline-atomics to the gcc-9 branch.
Tested on graviton2 aarch64-linux with bootstrap and
`make check` passes with no new fails.
Tested `make check` on glibc built with gcc-9 with and without
"-moutline-atomics"
and CFLAGS=" -O2 -g -fno-stack-protector
Hi Sebastian,
On 3/9/20 9:47 PM, Pop, Sebastian wrote:
Hi,
Please see attached the patches to add -moutline-atomics to the gcc-9 branch.
Tested on graviton2 aarch64-linux with bootstrap and
`make check` passes with no new fails.
Tested `make check` on glibc built with gcc-9 with and without
"-
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for pointing out the two missing bug fixes.
Please see attached all the back-ported patches.
All the patches from trunk applied cleanly with no conflicts (except for the
ChangeLog files) to the gcc-9 branch.
An up to date gcc-9 branch on which I applied the attached patches has
Ping, can we have the -moutline-atomics patches committed to the gcc-9 branch?
Thanks,
Sebastian
On 3/24/20, 7:24 PM, "Pop, Sebastian" wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for pointing out the two missing bug fixes.
Please see attached all the back-ported patches.
All the patches fro
Adding gcc-patches as I had somehow deleted it from the addresses...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Sent: 01 April 2020 15:23
> To: Pop, Sebastian
> Cc: Wilco Dijkstra ; richard.hender...@linaro.org
> Subject: RE: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics
--
> From: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Sent: 01 April 2020 15:23
> To: Pop, Sebastian
> Cc: Wilco Dijkstra ; richard.hender...@linaro.org
> Subject: RE: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> > -
Hi Sebastian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pop, Sebastian
> Sent: 01 April 2020 15:32
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Cc: Wilco Dijkstra ; richard.hender...@linaro.org;
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x
>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 02:32:03PM +, Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Thanks Kyrill! I will be happy to test the gcc-8 back-port of the patches.
Note, I have another fix, PR94435, that I've already bootstrapped and am
regtesting ATM, that will need to be included in any backports too
Thanks Jakub and Kyrill to point that out.
We will create a new branch called gcc-7-aarch64-outline-atomics or so with the
back-ported patches.
Sebastian
On 4/1/20, 9:36 AM, "Jakub Jelinek" wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 01:24, Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Kyrill,
>
> Thanks for pointing out the two missing bug fixes.
> Please see attached all the back-ported patches.
> All the patches from trunk applied cleanly with no conflicts (except for the
> ChangeLog files) to the gcc
I have also seen this error in tsan.
The fix is
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ea376dd471a3b006bc48945c1d9a29408ab17a04
"Fix shrinkwrapping interactions with atomics (PR92692)".
This fix got committed as the last patch in the series.
Sebastian
On 4/1/20, 5:13 PM, "Christophe Lyon
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 04:34, Pop, Sebastian wrote:
>
> I have also seen this error in tsan.
> The fix is
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ea376dd471a3b006bc48945c1d9a29408ab17a04
> "Fix shrinkwrapping interactions with atomics (PR92692)".
> This fix got committed as the last patch
12 matches
Mail list logo
