Re: [AArch64] Give some new costs for Cortex-A57 floating-point operations

2016-06-20 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 03/06/16 09:35, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > Hi, > > This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be > relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to this > feedback from Richard Sandiford [2] on Ramana's patch to calls.c [1] from > 2014: > > I think

Re: [AArch64] Give some new costs for Cortex-A57 floating-point operations

2016-06-20 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:29:46AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:35:50AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be > > relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to th

Re: [AArch64] Give some new costs for Cortex-A57 floating-point operations

2016-06-10 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:35:50AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > Hi, > > This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be > relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to this > feedback from Richard Sandiford [2] on Ramana's patch to calls.c [1] from

[AArch64] Give some new costs for Cortex-A57 floating-point operations

2016-06-03 Thread James Greenhalgh
Hi, This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to this feedback from Richard Sandiford [2] on Ramana's patch to calls.c [1] from 2014: I think this is really a bug in the backend. The backend is assigni