On 03/06/16 09:35, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be
> relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to this
> feedback from Richard Sandiford [2] on Ramana's patch to calls.c [1] from
> 2014:
>
> I think
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:29:46AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:35:50AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be
> > relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to th
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:35:50AM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be
> relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to this
> feedback from Richard Sandiford [2] on Ramana's patch to calls.c [1] from
Hi,
This patch rebases the floating-point cost table for Cortex-A57 to be
relative to the cost of a floating-point move. This in response to this
feedback from Richard Sandiford [2] on Ramana's patch to calls.c [1] from
2014:
I think this is really a bug in the backend. The backend is assigni