Ping?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Hurugalawadi, Naveen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached the patch that implements load pair(ldp) and store
> pair(stp) peephole for aarch64 target.
>
> Please review the same and let me know if its okay.
>
> Build and tested on aarch64-thunder-elf (using
Hi,
>> You are better off CCing the maintainers for such reviews. Let me do
>> that for you. I cannot approve or reject this patch but I have a few
>> comments as below.
Thanks for the quick review and comments.
Please find attached the modified patch as per review comments.
Please review the sa
You are better off CCing the maintainers for such reviews. Let me do
that for you. I cannot approve or reject this patch but I have a few
comments as below.
On 10/29/13 09:22, Hurugalawadi, Naveen wrote:
diff -uprN '-x*.orig' mainline-orig/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
gcc-4.8.0/gcc/confi
Hi,
Please consider this as a reminder to review the ldp and stp peephole
implementation for AArch64 target.
The patch was originally posted at:-
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg01051.html
Please review the same and let me know if its okay.
Build and tested on aarch64-thunder-elf
On Mar 26, 2013, at 3:27 AM, "Hurugalawadi, Naveen"
wrote:
> Please find attached the patch that implements load pair(ldp) and store
> pair(stp) peephole for aarch64 target.
Ah, I wish gcc had a better machine independent optimizer for load/store
combination.
Hi,
Please find attached the patch that implements load pair(ldp) and store
pair(stp) peephole for aarch64 target.
Please review the same and let me know if its okay.
Build and tested on aarch64-thunder-elf (using Cavium's internal
simulator). No new regressions.
Thanks,
Naveen
gcc/
2013-03-
