On 2/5/19 11:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:16:04AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
--- gcc/cp/optimize.c.jj2019-01-21 23:32:43.0 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/optimize.c 2019-02-04 16:40:21.354179933 +0100
@@ -417,6 +417,12 @@ maybe_thunk_body (tree fn, bool force)
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:16:04AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/optimize.c.jj2019-01-21 23:32:43.0 +0100
> > +++ gcc/cp/optimize.c 2019-02-04 16:40:21.354179933 +0100
> > @@ -417,6 +417,12 @@ maybe_thunk_body (tree fn, bool force)
> > gcc_assert (clone_
On 2/5/19 4:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As the following testcase shows, for thunks the expansion code sometimes
requires that arguments with gimple reg type aren't addressable,
thunk needs to be simple passing of arguments directly to another call, not
having extra statements in between tha
Hi!
As the following testcase shows, for thunks the expansion code sometimes
requires that arguments with gimple reg type aren't addressable,
thunk needs to be simple passing of arguments directly to another call, not
having extra statements in between that.
In particular, for pass_by_reference a
