On 11/26/19 6:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 04:58:01PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
Hmm, we shouldn't have any PLACEHOLDER_EXPR under a RANGE_EXPR; if we did,
any references to its address would end up all referring to the first
element of the range, which would be wrong.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 04:58:01PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Hmm, we shouldn't have any PLACEHOLDER_EXPR under a RANGE_EXPR; if we did,
> any references to its address would end up all referring to the first
> element of the range, which would be wrong. How about skipping RANGE_EXPR
> in
On 11/22/19 9:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On the following testcase, replace_placeholders is called on a CONSTRUCTOR
{ a, [1..63] = NON_LVALUE_EXPR<42> }
and call build_ctor_subob_ref in that case. The problem is that index is
RANGE_EXPR and as it is not INTEGER_CST, we call
Hi!
On the following testcase, replace_placeholders is called on a CONSTRUCTOR
{ a, [1..63] = NON_LVALUE_EXPR<42> }
and call build_ctor_subob_ref in that case. The problem is that index is
RANGE_EXPR and as it is not INTEGER_CST, we call
build_class_member_access_expr which is not appropriate
