On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 4:36 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 02:44:32PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > Is there a reason not to use the 'move' function here?
> > >
> > > That doesn't work at all. move doesn't call cp_convert, but
> > > build_static_cast (though for the
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 02:44:32PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > Is there a reason not to use the 'move' function here?
> >
> > That doesn't work at all. move doesn't call cp_convert, but
> > build_static_cast (though for the same reference && type).
> > But while cp_convert only adds
On 12/2/18 8:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 07:11:08PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On the following testcase, build_conditional_expr_1 tries hard to make sure
that if both arguments are xvalue_p (or one is and the other throw) the
result is still xvalue_p. But, later on we
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 07:11:08PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On the following testcase, build_conditional_expr_1 tries hard to make sure
> > that if both arguments are xvalue_p (or one is and the other throw) the
> > result is still xvalue_p. But, later on we call unary_complex_lvalue,
> >
On 11/29/18 4:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On the following testcase, build_conditional_expr_1 tries hard to make sure
that if both arguments are xvalue_p (or one is and the other throw) the
result is still xvalue_p. But, later on we call unary_complex_lvalue,
which does
Hi!
On the following testcase, build_conditional_expr_1 tries hard to make sure
that if both arguments are xvalue_p (or one is and the other throw) the
result is still xvalue_p. But, later on we call unary_complex_lvalue,
which does rationalize_conditional_expr which changes it from
cond ? x : y
