OK.
Jason
Hi,
I'm a bit nervous about the instantiated tree being a different kind
of tree from the template one, such that TREE_NO_WARNING doesn't make
sense on the new one. Maybe just check EXPR_P (r) as well.
I see, better be safe. The below still passes testing. Ok?
Thanks,
Paolo.
I'm a bit nervous about the instantiated tree being a different kind of
tree from the template one, such that TREE_NO_WARNING doesn't make sense
on the new one. Maybe just check EXPR_P (r) as well.
Jason
Hi,
we emit spurious -Wparentheses warnings for template arguments,
evidently because we are not propagating TREE_NO_WARNING during
tsubstitution.
I'm fixing the problem in a straightforward way, by using the same idiom
already used elsewhere: call build_x_binary_op and then propagate
TREE_
