OK.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a rather straightforward issue that we didn't notice so far only because in
> all our uses of __is_trivially_constructible either neither type is
> dependent or both are (eg, in library uses). The below
Hi,
a rather straightforward issue that we didn't notice so far only because
in all our uses of __is_trivially_constructible either neither type is
dependent or both are (eg, in library uses). The below handles in the
obvious way a possible TREE_LIST - built node by node by