On 9 May 2012 01:34, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> A suggestion: Make dwarf_name call the demangler, and then a (new?) a
>>> function that converts a mangled decl to a human-readable string. In
>>> any case, the pretty-printer does a lot of stuff that is mostly
>>> useless for just printing a declaratio
>> A suggestion: Make dwarf_name call the demangler, and then a (new?) a
>> function that converts a mangled decl to a human-readable string. In
>> any case, the pretty-printer does a lot of stuff that is mostly
>> useless for just printing a declaration (translation, wrapping, etc.).
>>
>> Bonus p
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> A suggestion: Make dwarf_name call the demangler, and then a (new?) a
> function that converts a mangled decl to a human-readable string. In
> any case, the pretty-printer does a lot of stuff that is mostly
> useless for just printing a
On 8 May 2012 18:20, Sterling Augustine wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Sterling Augustine
>> wrote:
>>> This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl pretty printing
>>> more closely match the demangler. A full e
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Sterling Augustine
wrote:
> Do you have a suggestion for fixing the disagreement? I would love to
> add this as a parameter somewhere, but the decision is very deep in
> the internals of the pretty printer.
I disagree with your characterization that the pretty-pr
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Sterling Augustine
> wrote:
>> This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl pretty printing
>> more closely match the demangler. A full explanation is here:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Sterling Augustine
wrote:
> This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl pretty printing
> more closely match the demangler. A full explanation is here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00512.html
>
> OK for mainline?
Now I realize som
This is the second in the series of patches to make c decl pretty printing
more closely match the demangler. A full explanation is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00512.html
OK for mainline?
Sterling
2012-05-07 Sterling Augustine
* c-family/c-pretty-print.c (pp_c
