On 05/31/2014 02:30 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Also, I am pretty sure that gcc doesn't support the latest constexpr, we
shouldn't define those macros lightly.
That's correct. We should leave __cpp_constexpr at 200704 for now.
I think having __has_include for all languages is fine since it is
On 06/02/2014 10:31 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/31/2014 02:30 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Also, I am pretty sure that gcc doesn't support the latest constexpr, we
shouldn't define those macros lightly.
That's correct. We should leave __cpp_constexpr at 200704 for now.
Right... That was a
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ cpp_undef (pfile, __cpp_constexpr);
+ cpp_define (pfile, __cpp_constexpr=201304);
Could you set the other value in an else branch to avoid a def undef redef
game?
Also, I am pretty sure that gcc doesn't support the latest
This is the c-family part: Setting the language feature macos and
defining the __has_include macro.
c-family:
2014-05-31 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
Implement SD-6: SG10 Feature Test Recommendations
* c-cppbuiltin.c (c_cpp_builtins()): Define language feature
