On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 1:39 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:55PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > + node = splay_tree_predecessor (cases, (splay_tree_key) min_value);
> > ...
> > > + if (CASE_HIGH ((tree) node->value)
> > > + &&
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:41:55PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > + node = splay_tree_predecessor (cases, (splay_tree_key) min_value);
> ...
> > + if (CASE_HIGH ((tree) node->value)
> > + && tree_int_cst_compare (CASE_HIGH ((tree) node->value),
> > +
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:39 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:06:33AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Alternatively, I believe we could remove from the patch the in-place
> > replacement of CASE_LABEL_EXPRs with LABEL_EXPRs if we want to remove,
> > just splay_tree_remove
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:06:33AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Alternatively, I believe we could remove from the patch the in-place
> replacement of CASE_LABEL_EXPRs with LABEL_EXPRs if we want to remove,
> just splay_tree_remove those, because by my reading of
>
