On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 07:48:47AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
vmx.exp sets a bunch of options and the test overrides that now. Options
like -maltivec are pretty important for this test to work -- it #includes
altivec.h, which does #error unless -maltivec is set, and things go downhill
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:35:12AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:23:08PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
This seems to have caused a number of new failures in the PPC
testsuite for vmx/unpack.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:35:12AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:23:08PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
This seems to have caused
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:23:08PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
This seems to have caused a number of new failures in the PPC
testsuite for vmx/unpack.
Sorry about that. Should be fixed with this patch I'm about to
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:23:08PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
This seems to have caused a number of new failures in the PPC
testsuite for vmx/unpack.
Sorry about that. Should be fixed with this patch I'm about to commit.
2015-07-21 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
*
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:51:33PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I'll approve the C++ parts given how simple they are :-)
Thanks, I've committed the patch now after another regtest/bootstrap.
Marek
This seems to have caused a number of new failures in the PPC
testsuite for vmx/unpack.
- David
Ping^6.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:23:43PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping^5.
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:42:39AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping^4.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:08:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
I'm pinging the C++ parts.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:44:36PM
On 07/17/2015 02:09 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping^6.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:23:43PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping^5.
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:42:39AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping^4.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:08:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
I'm pinging the C++ parts.
On
Ping^5.
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:42:39AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping^4.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:08:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
I'm pinging the C++ parts.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:44:36PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:07:29AM
Ping^4.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:08:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
I'm pinging the C++ parts.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:44:36PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:07:29AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:55:08AM
I'm pinging the C++ parts.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:44:36PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:07:29AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:55:08AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:04:19PM +, Joseph Myers
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:07:29AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:55:08AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:04:19PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
The C changes are OK.
Jason, do you want to approve the C++ parts?
Marek
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:55:08AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:04:19PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
The C changes are OK.
Jason, do you want to approve the C++ parts?
Thanks,
Marek
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:04:19PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
The C changes are OK.
Jason, do you want to approve the C++ parts?
Thanks,
Marek
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
Well, ok then. This new version incorporates Richard S.'s suggestion,
and warns even for 1 31 in C99/C11 (also in C90 when -Wshift-overflow
is explicitely specified). For C++, it warns about 1 31 by default
only in C++11 mode, in C++14 never,
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:25:32PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:49:58PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
+/* Warn if signed left shift overflows. Note that we don't warn
+ about left-shifting 1 into the sign bit; cf.
+
17 matches
Mail list logo
