Am Montag, den 23.11.2020, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Christophe Lyon:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 07:34, Uecker, Martin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Here is another version of the patch. The
> > only difference is the additional the check
> > using 'tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion'.
> >
> >
> >
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 07:34, Uecker, Martin
wrote:
>
>
>
> Here is another version of the patch. The
> only difference is the additional the check
> using 'tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion'.
>
>
> Best,
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> C: Drop qualifiers during lvalue conversion. PR97702
>
> 2020
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> Apparently I did not have enough coffee when
> generalizing this to the other qualifiers.
>
> Ok, with the following test?
OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Am Donnerstag, den 19.11.2020, 18:58 + schrieb Joseph Myers:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Uecker, Martin wrote:
...
>
> > +void g(void)
> > +{
> > + volatile int j;
> > + typeof((0,j)) i21; i21 = j;;
> > + typeof(+j) i22; i22 = j;;
> > + typeof(-j) i23; i23 = j;;
> > + typeof(1?j:0) i24; i24 = j;;
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> Here is another version of the patch. The
> only difference is the additional the check
> using 'tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion'.
The code changes in this one are OK. However, in the test:
> +void f(void)
> +{
> + const int j;
> + typeof((0,j)) i1
Here is another version of the patch. The
only difference is the additional the check
using 'tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion'.
Best,
Martin
C: Drop qualifiers during lvalue conversion. PR97702
2020-11-XX Martin Uecker
gcc/
* gcc/gimplify.c (gimplify_modify
