Tested native x86_64-linux and cris-elf. The "recent patch
to gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr100359.c" refers to r13-6838.
Committed as obvious after that commit.
-- >8 --
The test gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c fails the
scan-tree-dump-not fre1 "baz" for at least m68k-linux,
pru-elf, and cris-elf according to posts on gcc-testresults.
GCC requires int-size-alignment for a target to see through
the "int *" dereference and perform value-numbering. See
comments in PR91419 and also the recent patch to
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr100359.c This is a flaw in gcc rather
than the target, so prefer an xfail rather than skipping
the test.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c: XFAIL for ! natural_alignment_32.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c
index ead76548f3df..1b6a3a398a4e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ void foo (int *p, int n)
while (--n);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "baz" "fre1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "baz" "fre1" { xfail { !
natural_alignment_32 } } } } */
--
2.30.2
