On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 8:28 PM Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-05-13 20:19:42 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-04-30 17:24:15 -0400, Andrew MacLeod
> > wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions. pushed.
> >
> > Starting with this patch
On Mon, 2024-05-13 20:19:42 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-30 17:24:15 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> > Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions. pushed.
>
> Starting with this patch (upstream as
> e8ae56a7dc46e39a48017bb5159e4dc672ec7fad, can still be
On Tue, 2024-04-30 17:24:15 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions. pushed.
Starting with this patch (upstream as
e8ae56a7dc46e39a48017bb5159e4dc672ec7fad, can still be reproduced with
0c585c8d0dd85601a8d116ada99126a48c8ce9fd as of May 13th), my
Also during stage 3/4, we discovered that it is unsafe to call ranger
from within SCEV. This is because ranger uses SCEV to resolve PHIS, and
we can end up in a bad loop under the right conditions.
The fix is for ranger's cache to NOT try to pre-evaluate PHIs (which is
kind of waste anyway
