On 11/20/2017 05:41 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
I have just committed (r254949) the attached patch to fix a regression
in the arm tests after this was committed (r254691).
I hope it's obvious enough.
I certainly think so. thanks!
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
Hi,
On 9 November 2017 at 00:25, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 10:36 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> On 11/02/2017 04:33 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
[CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
>>>
My Tcl skills aren't great, so hopefully
On 11/08/2017 10:36 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 04:33 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> [CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
>>
>>> My Tcl skills aren't great, so hopefully someone else can review this;
>>> CCing Rainer and Mike.
On 11/02/2017 04:33 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
[CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
My Tcl skills aren't great, so hopefully someone else can review this;
CCing Rainer and Mike.
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01911
On 10/26/2017 12:23 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/26/2017 02:12 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
On 10/26/17, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Possibly a silly question, but is it OK to have a formatted string
call in which some of the arguments aren't consumed?
On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
[CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
My Tcl skills aren't great, so hopefully someone else can review this;
CCing Rainer and Mike.
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01911.html
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
On 10/26/2017 02:12 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
On 10/26/17, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Possibly a silly question, but is it OK to have a formatted string
call in which some of the arguments aren't consumed? (here "col" is only
consumed for the true case,
On 10/26/17, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> [CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
>
>> Alternate idea: could show_column become a tri-state:
>>* default: show non-zero columns
>>* never: never show columns
>>* always: always show a col
On 10/26/2017 10:34 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
[CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
Alternate idea: could show_column become a tri-state:
* default: show non-zero columns
* never: never show columns
* always: always show a column, printing 0 for the no-column case
and then us
[CCing Rainer and Mike for the gcc-dg.exp part]
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 07:33 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On the modules branch, I'm starting to add location
> information. Line
> numbers don't really make sense when reporting errors reading a
> binary
> file, so I wanted to change the diagnos
On the modules branch, I'm starting to add location information. Line
numbers don't really make sense when reporting errors reading a binary
file, so I wanted to change the diagnostics such that line number zero
(which is not a line) is not printed -- one just gets the file name. I
then notic
11 matches
Mail list logo
