Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-10-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Gerald, On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 12:17:48AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Mark Wielaard wrote: > >> Although there were some positive responses (on list and on irc) it is > >> sometimes hard to know if there really is consensus for these kind of > >> infrastructure tweaks.

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-10-03 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> Although there were some positive responses (on list and on irc) it is >> sometimes hard to know if there really is consensus for these kind of >> infrastructure tweaks. But I believe there is at least no sustained >> opposition to changing the

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi all, On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 10:04:37PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > We (Jeff or anyone else with mailman admin privs) could use the same > > settings for gcc-patches. The settings that need to be set are in that > > bug: > > > > - subject_prefix (general): (empty) > > - from_is_list

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-17 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi all, On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Adding Jeff to CC who is the official gcc-patches mailinglist admin. > [...] > Yes, it is expected for emails that come from domains with a dmarc > policy. That is because the current settings of the gcc-patches >

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-14 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Richard, On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:07:21AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:00 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > The only visible change (apart from no more From rewriting) is that > > HTML multi-parts aren't scrubbed anymore (that would be a message > > altering issue).

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-14 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Thomas, On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:00:39AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >> Let me know if you want Jeff (or me or one of the other overseers) make > >> the above changes to the gcc-patches mailman settings. > > > > yes, please! > > Yes, please! For all mailing lists, globally. Call me a

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-14 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:00 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Maxim, > > Adding Jeff to CC who is the official gcc-patches mailinglist admin. > > On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:08 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > Normally, notifications from Linaro TCWG precommit CI are sent only to > > patch author and

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Mark! On 2023-09-13T17:02:05+0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> On 12 Sep 2023, at 16:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: >> Adding Jeff to CC who is the official gcc-patches mailinglist admin. >> >> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:08 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >>> Normally, notifications from Linaro TCWG

Re: gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-13 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Mark, > On 12 Sep 2023, at 16:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Adding Jeff to CC who is the official gcc-patches mailinglist admin. > > On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:08 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >> Normally, notifications from Linaro TCWG precommit CI are sent only to >> patch author and patch

gcc-patches From rewriting mailman settings (Was: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions)

2023-09-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Maxim, Adding Jeff to CC who is the official gcc-patches mailinglist admin. On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:08 +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Normally, notifications from Linaro TCWG precommit CI are sent only to > patch author and patch submitter. In this case the sender was rewritten > to

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions

2023-09-12 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc-patches
Hi Everyone, Normally, notifications from Linaro TCWG precommit CI are sent only to patch author and patch submitter. In this case the sender was rewritten to "Benjamin Priour via Gcc-patches ", which was detected by Patchwork [1] as patch submitter. Hi Mark, Is "From:" re-write on

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #75674: FAIL: 68 regressions

2023-09-11 Thread ci_notify--- via Gcc-patches
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer