On Fri, 13 May 2011, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011 15:27:37 + (UTC)
> "Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 11 May 2011, Julian Brown wrote:
> >
> > > There's currently no support for "long long" fixed-point types,
> > > since those imply support for TImode arithmetic, which is
On Wed, 11 May 2011 15:27:37 + (UTC)
"Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Julian Brown wrote:
>
> > There's currently no support for "long long" fixed-point types,
> > since those imply support for TImode arithmetic, which isn't
> > sensible on ARM. I've modified tests to make opt
On Wed, 11 May 2011 15:45:52 +0100
Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Julian Brown writes:
> > Tested with cross to ARM Linux. OK to apply?
>
> Just out of interest, are you able to test the patch on MIPS as well?
> I was wondering whether the fixed-point results there change after the
> target-indepen
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Julian Brown wrote:
> non-saturating variants where appropriate). Other functionality is
> provided by support functions in libgcc (type conversions,
> comparisons, and so on). Although more efficient versions of some of
> these could be implemented inline, it seems to me they
Julian Brown writes:
> Tested with cross to ARM Linux. OK to apply?
Just out of interest, are you able to test the patch on MIPS as well?
I was wondering whether the fixed-point results there change after the
target-independent parts of the patch. (I think MIPS is still the only
port with in-tre
