Hi, Ramana and Joseph,
Thank you for your reviewing! Sorry for the late response.
Before I submit the new modified patch, I want to make something more specific.
> The -mwmmxt option is not acceptable as it stands today. IIRC the msimd
> option was the plan long term when we talked about this
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Xinyu Qi wrote:
>
>> *gcc/config/arm/elf.h: Add option -mwmmxt.
>> *gcc/config/arm/arm.opt: Same.
>
> Why? And where are the documentation updates? How does this relate to
> the existing iWMMXt options?
>
> I thought the plan (Ramana?) was to move to
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Xinyu Qi wrote:
> *gcc/config/arm/elf.h: Add option -mwmmxt.
> *gcc/config/arm/arm.opt: Same.
Why? And where are the documentation updates? How does this relate to
the existing iWMMXt options?
I thought the plan (Ramana?) was to move to having a -msimd= option to
select
Hi,
This patch maintains iWMMXT intrinsics code,
adds WMMX pipeline description
and supports iWMMXT auto-vectorization.
Ran Arm testsuite on arm-linux-gnueabi.
*gcc/config/arm/elf.h: Add option -mwmmxt.
*gcc/config/arm/arm.opt: Same.
*gcc/config/arm/arm.c (arm_option_override): Same.
(arm_coproc
