Re: [PATCH, GCC/testsuite/ARM] XFAIL optional_thumb-1 and optional_thumb-2 testcases

2016-12-05 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
On 05/12/16 09:01, Christophe Lyon wrote: On 2 December 2016 at 17:35, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: Hi, The logic to make -mthumb optional for Thumb-only targets was designed to only apply when no mode is specified either at compile time or when the toolchain was configured (using --with-mode).

Re: [PATCH, GCC/testsuite/ARM] XFAIL optional_thumb-1 and optional_thumb-2 testcases

2016-12-05 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 2 December 2016 at 17:35, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > Hi, > > The logic to make -mthumb optional for Thumb-only targets was designed to > only apply when no mode is specified either at compile time or when the > toolchain was configured (using --with-mode). The dg-skip-if in the > testcases opti

[PATCH, GCC/testsuite/ARM] XFAIL optional_thumb-1 and optional_thumb-2 testcases

2016-12-02 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Hi, The logic to make -mthumb optional for Thumb-only targets was designed to only apply when no mode is specified either at compile time or when the toolchain was configured (using --with-mode). The dg-skip-if in the testcases optional_thumb-1 and optional_thumb-2 catch the former case but no