On 11/11/2019 14:50, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Thanks for the explanation. However, I do not understand why are we
>> returning with the default value.
>
> The regression you reported should be clear enough though: if we don't do
> that, we will unroll in cases where we would not have before. Try w
> Thanks for the explanation. However, I do not understand why are we
> returning with the default value.
The regression you reported should be clear enough though: if we don't do
that, we will unroll in cases where we would not have before. Try with a
compiler that predates the pragma and com
Hi Eric
On 08/11/2019 19:16, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I was fiddling around with the loop unrolling pass and noticed a check
>> in decide_unroll_* functions (in the patch). The comment on top of this
>> check says
>> "/* If we were not asked to unroll this loop, just return back silently.
>>*/"
> I was fiddling around with the loop unrolling pass and noticed a check
> in decide_unroll_* functions (in the patch). The comment on top of this
> check says
> "/* If we were not asked to unroll this loop, just return back silently.
> */"
> However the check returns when loop->unroll == 0 ra
Hi
I was fiddling around with the loop unrolling pass and noticed a check
in decide_unroll_* functions (in the patch). The comment on top of this
check says
"/* If we were not asked to unroll this loop, just return back silently.
*/"
However the check returns when loop->unroll == 0 rather tha
