On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Carrot Wei writes:
>> Index: simplify-got.c
>> ===
>> --- simplify-got.c (revision 224174)
>> +++ simplify-got.c (working copy)
>> @@ -169,7 +169,10 @@
>>
>>/* Since the
Carrot Wei writes:
> Index: simplify-got.c
> ===
> --- simplify-got.c (revision 224174)
> +++ simplify-got.c (working copy)
> @@ -169,7 +169,10 @@
>
>/* Since there is no usage of pic_reg now, we can remove it. */
>if (use)
>
ok.
David
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Hi
>
> I forgot to notify df framework when I removed an insn, it caused df
> verification failure described in google bug b/16155462.
>
> The following patch passed regression test on arm qemu in both thumb
> and arm modes.
> OK for
Hi
I forgot to notify df framework when I removed an insn, it caused df
verification failure described in google bug b/16155462.
The following patch passed regression test on arm qemu in both thumb
and arm modes.
OK for google 4.9 branch?
Index: simplify-got.c
==
