On 12 May 17:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> >> 2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich
> >>
> >> PR target/65103
> >> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_rtx_costs): We want to propagate
> >> link time constants into adress expressions and therefore set
> >> their cost to 0.
> >>
>
Hello!
>> 2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich
>>
>> PR target/65103
>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_rtx_costs): We want to propagate
>> link time constants into adress expressions and therefore set
>> their cost to 0.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>>
>> 2015-03-10 Ilya Enkovich
>>
Ping
2015-03-10 19:14 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich :
> On 10 Mar 18:11, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch changes rtx cost for address constants to 0 similar to what we
>> have in address cost hook beacuse we expect them to be propagated into
>> address expression anyway. Bootstrapped and
On 10 Mar 18:11, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch changes rtx cost for address constants to 0 similar to what we
> have in address cost hook beacuse we expect them to be propagated into
> address expression anyway. Bootstrapped and tested on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk o
Hi,
This patch changes rtx cost for address constants to 0 similar to what we have
in address cost hook beacuse we expect them to be propagated into address
expression anyway. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK
for trunk or stage 1?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-10 Ilya
