Re: [PATCH, PR58805] Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge

2013-10-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/23/13 02:16, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote: Richard, This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the tail-merge pass. Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch? Than

Re: [PATCH, PR58805] Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge

2013-10-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/23/13 10:02, Tom de Vries wrote: On 22/10/13 20:50, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote: Richard, This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the tail-merge pass. Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch? Thanks, -

Re: [PATCH, PR58805] Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge

2013-10-23 Thread Tom de Vries
On 22/10/13 20:50, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote: >> Richard, >> >> This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the >> tail-merge pass. >> >> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. >> >> OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch? >> >> Thanks, >> - Tom >> >> 2

Re: [PATCH, PR58805] Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge

2013-10-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Tom de Vries wrote: > Richard, > > This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the > tail-merge pass. > > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. > > OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch? Ok. Thanks, Richard.

Re: [PATCH, PR58805] Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge

2013-10-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote: > > Richard, > > > > This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the > > tail-merge pass. > > > > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. > > > > OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch? > > > > Thanks,

Re: [PATCH, PR58805] Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge

2013-10-22 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/22/13 03:58, Tom de Vries wrote: Richard, This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the tail-merge pass. Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch? Thanks, - Tom 2013-10-22 Tom de Vries PR tree-optimization/58805

[PATCH, PR58805] Add missing check in stmt_local_def for tail-merge

2013-10-22 Thread Tom de Vries
Richard, This patch adds a missing check for gimple_vdef in stmt_local_def for the tail-merge pass. Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. OK for trunk, gcc-4_8-branch? Thanks, - Tom 2013-10-22 Tom de Vries PR tree-optimization/58805 * tree-ssa-tail-merge.c (stmt_local_def)