On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Here is a potentially contentious patch for PR fortran/52879.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
> >
> > As demonstrated in that PR, it is
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> All,
>
> Here is a potentially contentious patch for PR fortran/52879.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
>
> As demonstrated in that PR, it is possible to provide RANDOM_SEED
> with sets of seeds that result in a very poor se
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 03:31:09PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Steve,
>
> First, it is needed to remove the line
>
> mpz_t put_size, get_size;
>
> in gcc/fortran/check.c, otherwise compiling the file with -Werror
> (default) fails.
OK.
> Second, the patch breaks the interface of RAND
Steve,
First, it is needed to remove the line
mpz_t put_size, get_size;
in gcc/fortran/check.c, otherwise compiling the file with -Werror
(default) fails.
Second, the patch breaks the interface of RANDOM_SEED(GET/PUT...)
as shown for gfortran.dg/random_seed_1.f90 and the original test
in pr52
All,
Here is a potentially contentious patch for PR fortran/52879.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879
As demonstrated in that PR, it is possible to provide RANDOM_SEED
with sets of seeds that result in a very poor sequences of PRN.
Gfortran's RANDOM_NUMBER uses 3 independent KISS
