Re: [PATCH, libgcc/ARM & testsuite, ping] Optimize executable size when using softfloat fmul/dmul

2018-11-26 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 26, 2018, at 1:46 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > Ping? The testsuite parts are Ok. > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 10:51, Thomas Preudhomme > wrote: >> >> FWIW, the testcases were taken from >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg01026.html

Re: [PATCH, libgcc/ARM & testsuite, ping] Optimize executable size when using softfloat fmul/dmul

2018-11-26 Thread Thomas Preudhomme
Ping? Best regards, Thomas On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 10:51, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: > > FWIW, the testcases were taken from > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg01026.html > > Previous approach for fixing tying of fmul to fdiv can be seen in > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04