On Sat, 2015-06-20 at 13:37 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:36 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
all targets, but it may expose
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 20:36 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65914 demonstrates that we
fail to match vector predicates with pseudos that are in the virtual
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 08:47:10PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
* g++.dg/torture/pr65419.C: New.
Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
all targets, but it may expose latent bugs
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:36 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
all targets, but it may expose latent bugs on other targets.
A latent bug is one that
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65914 demonstrates that we
fail to match vector predicates with pseudos that are in the virtual
stack register range. The reduced test case provided with the bug
report, when compiled for the C++14 standard, demonstrates that we need
to be able to
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65914 demonstrates that we
fail to match vector predicates with pseudos that are in the virtual
stack register range. The reduced test case provided with the bug
