Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Allow builtin-has-attribute-* to run as far as possible on targets without alias support.

2019-01-07 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Martin, > On 8 Jan 2019, at 00:25, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 1/7/19 9:55 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> A) >> Some of the builtin-has-attribute tests fail because a sub-set of them need >> symbol alias support. >> Darwin has only support for weak aliases and therefore we need to sk

Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Allow builtin-has-attribute-* to run as far as possible on targets without alias support.

2019-01-07 Thread Martin Sebor
On 1/7/19 9:55 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: Hi Martin, A) Some of the builtin-has-attribute tests fail because a sub-set of them need symbol alias support. Darwin has only support for weak aliases and therefore we need to skip these. However, the sub-set is small, and I am reluctant to throw out the

Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Allow builtin-has-attribute-* to run as far as possible on targets without alias support.

2019-01-07 Thread Jeff Law
On 1/7/19 9:55 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Hi Martin, > > A) > Some of the builtin-has-attribute tests fail because a sub-set of them need > symbol alias support. > Darwin has only support for weak aliases and therefore we need to skip these. > > However, the sub-set is small, and I am reluctant to

[PATCH, testsuite] Allow builtin-has-attribute-* to run as far as possible on targets without alias support.

2019-01-07 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Martin, A) Some of the builtin-has-attribute tests fail because a sub-set of them need symbol alias support. Darwin has only support for weak aliases and therefore we need to skip these. However, the sub-set is small, and I am reluctant to throw out the entire set for the sake of a small num