2013/12/3 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 5:02 AM, Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I should have used the following description, which seems much
better:
+/* { dg-skip-if Variadic funcs have all args on stack. Normal funcs have
args in registers. {
On 11/30/13, 9:07 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 28, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a pending testsuite patch for nds32 target:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01584.html
Is it OK for trunk? :)
Ok, but please remove:
{ target nds32*-*-*
On Dec 2, 2013, at 5:02 AM, Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I should have used the following description, which seems much better:
+/* { dg-skip-if Variadic funcs have all args on stack. Normal funcs have
args in registers. { nds32*-*-* } * } */
Reads nicely, thanks. Also,
On 11/28/13 03:03, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
Hi, Mike,
There is a pending testsuite patch for nds32 target:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01584.html
Is it OK for trunk? :)
Best regards,
jasonwucj
2013/11/14 Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com:
I would like to modify some
On Nov 28, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a pending testsuite patch for nds32 target:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01584.html
Is it OK for trunk? :)
Ok, but please remove:
{ target nds32*-*-* }
from the gcc.target test cases, it is
Hi, Mike,
There is a pending testsuite patch for nds32 target:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01584.html
Is it OK for trunk? :)
Best regards,
jasonwucj
2013/11/14 Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com:
I would like to modify some testcases for nds32 target.
Also I have some
Hi, Mike,
Recently the new nds32 port is approved and I committed it into trunk.
According to gcc testsuite report on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-11/msg00751.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-11/msg00752.html
I would like to modify some testcases for nds32
